Skip to content

fix(open-max-leverage): fix inaccuracies in the new pos value and total expo calculations - #905

Draft
KirienzoEth wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/liqprice-fix-max-leverage
Draft

fix(open-max-leverage): fix inaccuracies in the new pos value and total expo calculations#905
KirienzoEth wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/liqprice-fix-max-leverage

Conversation

@KirienzoEth

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reverting eff8b6d which is already a revert.

Closes RA2BL-712

…he new pos value and total expo

Reverting eff8b6d which is already a revert
@KirienzoEth KirienzoEth added To review The pull request need to be reviewed before merge 1 review required labels Apr 4, 2025
@KirienzoEth KirienzoEth self-assigned this Apr 4, 2025
@fireboss777
fireboss777 self-requested a review April 4, 2025 11:28

@fireboss777 fireboss777 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice again! 👍

@KirienzoEth
KirienzoEth marked this pull request as draft April 8, 2025 07:31
@KirienzoEth

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Putting back in draft to avoid accidently merging, waiting for more clarity on the upgrade process.

@KirienzoEth KirienzoEth changed the title fix(open-max-leverage): fix wrong values being used for calculating the new pos value and total expo fix(open-max-leverage): fix inaccuracies in the the new pos value and total expo calculations Apr 8, 2025
@KirienzoEth KirienzoEth changed the title fix(open-max-leverage): fix inaccuracies in the the new pos value and total expo calculations fix(open-max-leverage): fix inaccuracies in the new pos value and total expo calculations Apr 8, 2025
@KirienzoEth KirienzoEth removed To review The pull request need to be reviewed before merge 1 review required labels Apr 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants