refactor(doc): Add basic type annotations - #154
Merged
Conversation
SidOfc
force-pushed
the
refactor/type-annotations
branch
from
July 12, 2026 17:39
7ac7bcb to
dd2d3a1
Compare
Additionally: - Remove `vim.fn.*` functions with a `Lua: Prefer ...` directive - Add `util.extname` and `util.relative_path` functions - Fix flaky test which depended on known file extension on specific line
SidOfc
force-pushed
the
refactor/type-annotations
branch
13 times, most recently
from
July 12, 2026 19:13
a3d7704 to
d75fb6c
Compare
SidOfc
force-pushed
the
refactor/type-annotations
branch
from
July 12, 2026 19:14
d75fb6c to
b2d99a2
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Additionally:
vim.fn.*functions with aLua: Prefer ...directiveutil.extnameandutil.relative_pathfunctions