Skip to content

Require SciMLTesting 2.4 - #145

Merged
ChrisRackauckas merged 1 commit into
SciML:mainfrom
ChrisRackauckas-Claude:agent/scimltesting-2.4-basemodelica
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

ChrisRackauckas merged 1 commit into
SciML:mainfrom
ChrisRackauckas-Claude:agent/scimltesting-2.4-basemodelica

Conversation

@ChrisRackauckas-Claude

@ChrisRackauckas-Claude ChrisRackauckas-Claude commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ignore until reviewed by @ChrisRackauckas.

Summary

  • require registered SciMLTesting 2.4 in the root test target
  • require registered SciMLTesting 2.4 in the isolated QA environment
  • preserve the existing narrow ExplicitImports allowlist and all SciMLTesting 2.4 defaults

Resolution evidence

Both test environments resolved SciMLTesting v2.4.0 from the registry. The package status showed [09d9d899] SciMLTesting v2.4.0 without a path or repository override.

Local validation

  • GROUP=QA julia +release --project=. -e 'using Pkg; Pkg.test(; coverage = false)'
    • Julia 1.12.5
    • SciMLTesting v2.4.0
    • 19 passed, 1 existing justified broken allowlist, 20 total
    • completed in 9m42.4s
  • julia +release --project=. -e 'using Pkg; Pkg.test(; coverage = false)'
    • Julia parser: 75/75
    • ANTLR parser: 138/138
    • error messages: 25/25
    • 238/238 assertions passed
  • julia +release --project=../.runic_env -m Runic --check .
    • passed with exit 0

Process

No open PR from ChrisRackauckas-Claude covered this migration. The branch was created from SciML main at fab8c72; the fork was fast-forwarded first, and upstream had not moved before commit/push. No public API or rendered-doc changes were needed because SciMLTesting 2.4 strict QA passed as configured.

Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
@ChrisRackauckas
ChrisRackauckas marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2026 13:58
@ChrisRackauckas
ChrisRackauckas merged commit 6bf0435 into SciML:main Jul 21, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants