Skip to content

馃И Add test for VAL-SYN-007 (Duplicate Definitions) - #29

Open
Salah-Sal wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test-val-syn-007-13102920572237085417
Open

馃И Add test for VAL-SYN-007 (Duplicate Definitions)#29
Salah-Sal wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test-val-syn-007-13102920572237085417

Conversation

@Salah-Sal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This PR introduces a new test file tests/test_validation_syn_007.py to verify the functionality of the VAL-SYN-007 validation rule, which detects duplicate definitions across synsets. The test suite includes cases for detecting duplicates, verifying clean data, and checking scoped validation (filtering by lexicon ID). Additionally, src/wordnet_editor/importer.py was updated to move wn imports to the top level, resolving ModuleNotFoundError issues encountered during the test run.

Coverage

  • Positive Case: Creates two synsets with identical definitions and asserts that VAL-SYN-007 is raised with the correct count.
  • Negative Case: Creates two synsets with distinct definitions and asserts no warning is raised.
  • Filtered Case: Verifies that validation respects the lexicon_id filter, counting duplicates only within the specified scope.

Result

  • Confirmed that VAL-SYN-007 correctly identifies duplicates.
  • All 116 tests passed.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 13102920572237085417 started by @Salah-Sal

- Added `tests/test_validation_syn_007.py` to cover duplicate definitions across synsets.
- Includes positive test case (detection), negative test case (clean data), and filtered test case (scoped validation).
- Refactored imports in `src/wordnet_editor/importer.py` to fix `ModuleNotFoundError` during testing.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

馃憢 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 馃憖 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant