This research presents a comprehensive framework for automated mixed-precision quantization of deep neural networks, combining multiple optimization strategies to achieve optimal trade-offs between computational efficiency and model accuracy. We introduce a multi-stage optimization approach that leverages heuristic search, genetic algorithms, and Bayesian optimization to determine layer-wise bitwidth allocations while maintaining competitive performance on the CIFAR-10 benchmark.
Our framework introduces three complementary optimization strategies:
- Heuristic Search: Progressive bitwidth reduction with threshold-based recovery
- Genetic Algorithms: Population-based evolutionary optimization
- Bayesian Optimization: Probabilistic modeling of the quantization space
def update(bw_array, threshold):
i = 0
for name, module in net.named_ol_layers():
module.ol_update(bw_array[i], threshold)
i = i + 1
Stage 1 - Uniform Quantization:
bw = 8
while True:
bw_array = [bw] * num_layers
update(bw_array, 0.99)
test_acc = test()
if test_acc < max_acc - 1: break
bw = bw - 1Stage 2 - Threshold Optimization:
- Fixed bitwidth with adaptive threshold
- Progressive layer-wise bitwidth recovery
Evolutionary Optimization:
creator.create("FitnessMin", base.Fitness, weights=(-1.0,))
creator.create("Individual", list, fitness=creator.FitnessMin)
toolbox.register("attr_bool", random.randint, 2, 4)
toolbox.register("individual", tools.initRepeat, creator.Individual,
toolbox.attr_bool, int(num_layers))
Probabilistic Modeling:
def myf(array):
acc = update_and_test(array)
avg_bw = evalAvgBw(array)
return (94.84 - acc)**2 - (2.5*(4.48 - avg_bw))**2Search Space Definition:
space = [{'name': 'var_1', 'type': 'discrete',
'domain': (2,3,4,5), 'dimensionality': 38}]- Dataset: CIFAR-10 (50,000 training, 10,000 test images)
- Model: Pre-trained ResNet variant (38 layers)
- Baseline Accuracy: 94.84% (full quantization)
- Accuracy Preservation: (\text{Accuracy} \geq 93.84%)
- Average Bitwidth: Weighted combination of quantized and full-precision operations
- Computational Efficiency: Relative reduction in model size and operations
| Bitwidth | Threshold | Accuracy | Avg BW |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-bit | 1.0 | 94.68% | 8.00 |
| 8-bit | 0.99 | 94.81% | 8.08 |
| 4-bit | 1.0 | 90.75% | 4.00 |
| 4-bit | 0.95 | 94.63% | 4.60 |
# Load pre-trained model
checkpoint = torch.load('./checkpoint/ckpt_350_lr0.1.t7')
net = checkpoint['net']
# Quantization-aware evaluation
def test():
net.eval()
for batch_idx, (inputs, targets) in enumerate(testloader):
outputs = net(inputs)
# Accuracy computationpop_num = 20 # Population size
gen_num = 50 # Generations
CXPB, MUTPB = 0.5, 0.2 # Crossover and mutation probabilitiesbo = GPyOpt.methods.BayesianOptimization(myf, space)
bo.run_optimization(max_iter=30, eps=1e-8, verbosity=True)Feasibility Check:
def feasible(individual):
update(individual, threshold)
test_acc = test()
return test_acc > max_acc - 1Penalty-based Optimization:
toolbox.decorate("evaluate", tools.DeltaPenalty(feasible, penalty))Comparative Analysis:
- Heuristic Search: Fast, interpretable, suitable for initial exploration
- Genetic Algorithms: Robust, handles complex search spaces, population-based
- Bayesian Optimization: Sample-efficient, probabilistic modeling, global optimization
Key Findings:
- Different layers exhibit varying sensitivity to quantization
- Early and late layers often require higher precision
- Middle layers can tolerate aggressive quantization
Optimal Configurations:
- Mixed-precision (2-8 bits) outperforms uniform quantization
- Threshold-based approaches provide computational flexibility
- Evolutionary methods discover non-intuitive optimal configurations
- Model Compression: Reduced memory footprint for embedded systems
- Energy Efficiency: Lower computational requirements for battery-powered devices
- Real-time Inference: Faster processing on resource-constrained hardware
- Custom Accelerators: Informing design of mixed-precision arithmetic units
- Memory Hierarchy: Optimizing bandwidth requirements for different precisions
- Processor Architecture: Guiding support for variable-precision operations
- Neural Architecture Search: Integration with automated model design
- Training-aware Quantization: Joint optimization of training and quantization
- Cross-platform Deployment: Universal quantization strategies
# Core dependencies
torch
torchvision
numpy
# Optimization libraries
deap # Genetic algorithms
GPyOpt # Bayesian optimization
GPy # Gaussian processes# Load pre-trained model
from simple_solution import test, update
# Evaluate quantization configuration
bw_array = [4, 4, 8, 4, ...] # 38-layer configuration
update(bw_array, threshold=0.95)
accuracy = test()# Run heuristic search
python simple_solution.py
# Run genetic algorithm
python genetic_solution.py
# Run Bayesian optimization
python bo_solution.py- Dataset: Standard CIFAR-10 benchmark
- Model: Publicly available pre-trained weights
- Metrics: Standard classification accuracy and computational metrics
- Multiple random seeds for stochastic algorithms
- Cross-validation of optimal configurations
- Comparison against established quantization baselines
- Multi-objective Optimization: Joint optimization of accuracy, latency, and energy
- Transfer Learning: Quantization strategies transferable across architectures
- Online Adaptation: Dynamic bitwidth adjustment during inference
- Attention-based Networks: Transformer quantization strategies
- Generative Models: GAN and diffusion model quantization
- Reinforcement Learning: Policy network optimization
- FPGA Implementation: Custom hardware for mixed-precision operations
- Neuromorphic Computing: Integration with emerging hardware paradigms
- Compiler Optimization: Automated code generation for quantized models
Researchers are encouraged to extend this work in:
- Novel Optimization Algorithms
- Additional Model Architectures
- Hardware-aware Quantization
- Theoretical Analysis of Quantization Effects
Saad Abdur Razzaq
Machine Learning Engineer | Effixly AI