Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade socket.io from 2.4.1 to 3.0.0#429

Open
andersonsevla wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-0d0ef9fc4c6ccd5748a539ccf1bb4d27
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade socket.io from 2.4.1 to 3.0.0#429
andersonsevla wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-0d0ef9fc4c6ccd5748a539ccf1bb4d27

Conversation

@andersonsevla

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • backend/package.json
  • backend/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
  768  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Denial of Service (DoS)

…rabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
@backstage-rdstation

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Olá!

Obrigado por enviar o pull request para corrigir uma vulnerabilidade nas dependências do projeto. No entanto, para melhorar a qualidade da descrição do pull request, sugiro adicionar mais informações.

Você poderia explicar de forma clara o motivo da correção estar sendo feita, incluindo o contexto histórico da mudança, a justificativa da correção ou o racional por trás dela. Além disso, seria interessante incluir uma seção com o passo a passo ou as etapas necessárias para testar essa correção na prática.

Essas informações adicionais ajudarão a equipe a entender melhor o propósito do pull request e a realizar os testes necessários de forma mais eficiente.

Fico à disposição para ajudar com qualquer dúvida ou orientação adicional.

Obrigado pela colaboração!

Esse comentário foi gerado por inteligência artificial

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants