Skip to content

.github/templates: Add info about keeping AI section#22459

Merged
crasbe merged 1 commit into
RIOT-OS:masterfrom
AnnsAnns:ai_policy_make_clear_none
Jul 19, 2026
Merged

.github/templates: Add info about keeping AI section#22459
crasbe merged 1 commit into
RIOT-OS:masterfrom
AnnsAnns:ai_policy_make_clear_none

Conversation

@AnnsAnns

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contribution description

Sometimes people remove the AI section in the expectation that if none was used the section is useless. Add a smaller reminder to keep it so it hopefully doesn't happen in the future.

Testing procedure

No

Issues/PRs references

Declaration of AI-Tools / LLMs usage:

AI-Tools / LLMs that were used are:

  • none

@AnnsAnns
AnnsAnns requested a review from jia200x as a code owner July 10, 2026 11:20
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Area: doc Area: Documentation label Jul 10, 2026
@AnnsAnns AnnsAnns added CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR CI: skip compile test If set, CI server will run only non-compile jobs, but no compile jobs or their dependent jobs AI: None Stated AI was not (stated to be) used in this PR/Issue and removed Area: doc Area: Documentation labels Jul 10, 2026
@riot-ci

riot-ci commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Murdock results

✔️ PASSED

e36606e .github/templates: Add info about keeping AI section

Success Failures Total Runtime
1 0 1 01m:11s

Artifacts

@AnnsAnns AnnsAnns added the Area: doc Area: Documentation label Jul 10, 2026
@crasbe

crasbe commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think the first and second sentences are a bit redundant, but I'll take a closer look when I'm back on the computer.

@AnnsAnns

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I think the first and second sentences are a bit redundant, but I'll take a closer look when I'm back on the computer.

they are (intentionally)

Comment thread .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md Outdated
-->

### Declaration of AI-Tools / LLMs usage:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<!--
Keep this section as is even if no AI/LLM was used, **do not** remove it if you did not use any AI/LLM.
-->

Perhaps put it in front and in a separate comment for more chances of it being read?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also wanted to do that originally, just wasn't sure whether that would generate too much noise, will do that tho

@crasbe crasbe added Type: enhancement The issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation Impact: minor The PR is small in size and might only require a quick look of a knowledgeable reviewer labels Jul 10, 2026
Comment on lines +66 to +67
Keep this section as is even if no AI/LLM was used, **do not** remove it if you did not use any AI/LLM.
Thanks for contributing!

@kfessel kfessel Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Keep this section as is even if no AI/LLM was used, **do not** remove it if you did not use any AI/LLM.
Thanks for contributing!
Keep this section even if no AI/LLM was used, **do not** remove it.
-->
<!--
Thanks for contributing!

- none

<!--
Keep this section as is even if no AI/LLM was used, **do not** remove it if you did not use any AI/LLM.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Keep this section as is even if no AI/LLM was used, **do not** remove it if you did not use any AI/LLM.
Keep this section even if no AI/LLM was used, **do not** remove it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that was intentional: #22459 (comment)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

its still redundant just a little less

@kfessel

kfessel commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

#22004 (somhow this was to much) -> get a short statement in (Ann) -> make tags (Ann) -> please keep the statement (Ann) -> force a statement (Elena)

thanks @AnnsAnns and @elenaf9 for the work you put into this.

@kfessel kfessel left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I trust @AnnsAnns to find new or keep the current wording guiding contributors in the right direction

@kfessel

kfessel commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

reading #22345 makes me think we should add a general: "keep the structure if not unfit"

@AnnsAnns
AnnsAnns force-pushed the ai_policy_make_clear_none branch from 71d7323 to e36606e Compare July 19, 2026 09:06
@AnnsAnns

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Squashed 👍

@crasbe
crasbe enabled auto-merge July 19, 2026 17:19
@crasbe
crasbe added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 19, 2026
Merged via the queue into RIOT-OS:master with commit 7998790 Jul 19, 2026
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

AI: None Stated AI was not (stated to be) used in this PR/Issue Area: doc Area: Documentation CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR CI: skip compile test If set, CI server will run only non-compile jobs, but no compile jobs or their dependent jobs Impact: minor The PR is small in size and might only require a quick look of a knowledgeable reviewer Type: enhancement The issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants