Skip to content

Correction of message length – Protocol 126#1383

Open
elektron-bbs wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
master_SD_WS_126_R
Open

Correction of message length – Protocol 126#1383
elektron-bbs wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
master_SD_WS_126_R

Conversation

@elektron-bbs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
  • Tests for the changes have been added / modified (needed for for bug fixes / features)
  • commandref has been added / updated (needed for bug fixes / features)
  • What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
  • Bugfix (please link issue)
  • Feature enhancement
  • Documentation update
  • Unittest enhancement
  • other
  • What is the current behavior?
    (You can also link to an open issue here, if this describes the current behavior)
    Message length too long, see Fine_Offset_WH40 HomeAutoUser/rf_Gateway#5

  • What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
    Correction of message length
    Minor corrections to the documentation

  • Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
    no

  • Other information:

elektron-bbs and others added 2 commits July 12, 2026 11:11
Correction of message length – Protocol 126
Minor corrections to the documentation
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.25%. Comparing base (26691ff) to head (ea7128b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1383      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.68%   89.25%   +0.57%     
==========================================
  Files         150      152       +2     
  Lines       11035    11057      +22     
  Branches     1716     1717       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         9786     9869      +83     
+ Misses       1246     1188      -58     
+ Partials        3        0       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
fhem-00_SIGNALduino-5.24 49.82% <ø> (+1.68%) ⬆️
fhem-00_SIGNALduino-5.28 49.24% <ø> (+0.96%) ⬆️
fhem-00_SIGNALduino-5.32 49.84% <ø> (+2.12%) ⬆️
fhem-other_modules-5.24 56.72% <ø> (+0.80%) ⬆️
fhem-other_modules-5.28 57.07% <ø> (+1.45%) ⬆️
fhem-other_modules-5.32 56.30% <ø> (+0.36%) ⬆️
perl-modules-5.24 91.92% <ø> (+0.08%) ⬆️
perl-modules-5.28 91.97% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️
perl-modules-5.32 92.09% <ø> (+0.24%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sidey79

sidey79 commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ich habe den Branch bei mir laufen.
Ich bin unschlüssig ob der Empfang damit nicht etwas schlechter wird.
Kann aktuell aber nur mobil verbunden.

@elektron-bbs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Kann ich mir eigentlich nicht vorstellen, das der Empfang schlechter werden soll. Eher im Gegenteil, weil jetzt nicht mehr gewartet werden muss, bis der FIFO des CC1101 mit zufälligen Bytes gefüllt wird.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants