feat: add SOXL/TQQQ clean-cutover snapshots #199
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", | ||
| "$vocabulary": {"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/vocab/format-assertion": true}, | ||
| "$id": "https://quantstrategylab.github.io/schemas/soxl_tqqq_clean_cutover_snapshot.v1.schema.json", | ||
| "title": "Offline SOXL/TQQQ clean-cutover snapshot manifest", | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": false, | ||
| "required": [ | ||
| "schema", "pair_id", "symbols", "payload_sha256", "calendar_sha256", "timezone", "coverage", | ||
| "adjustment_semantics", "evidence_generation", "plugin", "offline_fixture", "source_identity", | ||
| "producer_identity", "producer_contract_version", "materialized_at", "materialization_receipt", "compatibility", "size" | ||
| ], | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "schema": {"const": "soxl_tqqq_clean_cutover_snapshot.v1"}, | ||
| "pair_id": {"enum": ["QQQ_TQQQ", "SOXX_SOXL"]}, | ||
| "symbols": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "string"}, "minItems": 2, "maxItems": 2, "uniqueItems": true}, | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a downstream consumer validates a manifest only against this new schema, Useful? React with 👍 / 👎. |
||
| "payload_sha256": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^[0-9a-f]{64}$"}, | ||
| "calendar_sha256": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^[0-9a-f]{64}$"}, | ||
| "timezone": {"const": "America/New_York"}, | ||
| "coverage": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": false, | ||
| "required": ["first_available_session", "last_available_session", "completed_sessions", "row_count", "per_symbol_counts"], | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "first_available_session": {"type": "string", "format": "date", "pattern": "^[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}$"}, | ||
| "last_available_session": {"type": "string", "format": "date", "pattern": "^[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}$"}, | ||
| "completed_sessions": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "string", "format": "date", "pattern": "^[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}$"}, "minItems": 1, "uniqueItems": true}, | ||
| "row_count": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 2}, | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For either supported pair, every completed session contains exactly two symbols, but this schema accepts an odd Useful? React with 👍 / 👎. |
||
| "per_symbol_counts": {"type": "object", "additionalProperties": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 1}} | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "adjustment_semantics": {"const": "adjusted_close"}, | ||
| "evidence_generation": {"const": "clean_cutover_v1"}, | ||
| "plugin": {"const": "ABSENT_DISABLED"}, | ||
| "offline_fixture": {"const": true}, | ||
| "source_identity": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1}, | ||
| "producer_identity": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1}, | ||
| "producer_contract_version": {"const": "soxl_tqqq_clean_cutover_snapshot.materializer.v1"}, | ||
| "materialized_at": {"type": "string", "format": "date-time", "pattern": "^[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}T[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}Z$"}, | ||
| "materialization_receipt": {"const": "offline_fixture"}, | ||
| "compatibility": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": false, | ||
| "required": ["legacy_read", "legacy_write", "dual_read", "auto_migration", "fallback", "side_by_side_namespace"], | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "legacy_read": {"const": "historical_read_only"}, | ||
| "legacy_write": {"const": "forbidden"}, | ||
| "dual_read": {"const": "forbidden"}, | ||
| "auto_migration": {"const": "forbidden"}, | ||
| "fallback": {"const": "forbidden"}, | ||
| "side_by_side_namespace": {"const": "required_new_namespace"} | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "size": {"const": 0} | ||
| }, | ||
| "allOf": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "if": {"properties": {"pair_id": {"const": "QQQ_TQQQ"}}, "required": ["pair_id"]}, | ||
| "then": { | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "symbols": {"const": ["QQQ", "TQQQ"]}, | ||
| "coverage": { | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "per_symbol_counts": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": false, | ||
| "required": ["QQQ", "TQQQ"], | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "QQQ": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 1}, | ||
| "TQQQ": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 1} | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "if": {"properties": {"pair_id": {"const": "SOXX_SOXL"}}, "required": ["pair_id"]}, | ||
| "then": { | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "symbols": {"const": ["SOXX", "SOXL"]}, | ||
| "coverage": { | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "per_symbol_counts": { | ||
| "type": "object", | ||
| "additionalProperties": false, | ||
| "required": ["SOXX", "SOXL"], | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "SOXX": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 1}, | ||
| "SOXL": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 1} | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When a downstream consumer uses an ordinary Draft 2020-12 validator without separately installing and enabling a format checker,
formatremains annotation-only because$schemaselects the standard meta-schema; declaring$vocabularyin this instance schema does not activate assertion behavior. Dates such as2026-02-30therefore satisfy the regex and pass schema validation, while the test masks this by explicitly supplyingFORMAT_CHECKER; select a meta-schema that declares the assertion vocabulary or otherwise make the validator requirement enforceable.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.