missing the "interactive" part

[illeatmyhat]

The model definition and its training data seem to be available, but the "interactive" parts mentioned in the supplement are conspicuously absent. Is this intentional?

[OndrejTexler]

Hello. Thanks for the comment! Yes, it is partly intentional - I did not want to make the code too complicated, so I released only the "core". But I will consider preparing and releasing the interactive code as well (I would need to "clean" the code first, so it will definitely take me some time).

[renhaa]

Impressive paper! I'm also interested in the "interactive" code.