docs: document HACS installation - #2
Open
abonforti wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
The README only described copying files by hand, although the repository already had everything needed to be added to HACS as a custom repository. Adds the My Home Assistant button, the manual HACS steps for instances the redirect cannot reach, and the minimum Home Assistant version.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The README only describes copying files by hand, but the repository already has everything HACS needs to be added as a custom repository:
hacs.json, amanifest.jsoncarrying aversion, and av1.0.0release. So that path works today and is worth documenting.Adds the My Home Assistant button, the manual HACS steps for instances the redirect cannot reach, and the minimum Home Assistant version.
Independent of my other PR — the version stated here (2024.11) matches the
hacs.jsonfloor corrected there, so if you take this one alone the number is still accurate for the code as it stands.