Skip to content

docs: README uses Bun, not npm/Node - #24

Merged
vpetersson merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/readme-bun
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

docs: README uses Bun, not npm/Node#24
vpetersson merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/readme-bun

Conversation

@vpetersson-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The README documented an npm/Node workflow, but this project uses Bun for all JS tooling.

  • Dev/build commands: bun install, bun run dev, bun run build.
  • Corrected the CI/deployment description — it claimed "Node.js 20 + npm ci + build Tailwind", but the actual deploy.yml sets up Bun + Hugo, installs with bun install, lints/format-checks, and builds with hugo --minify.
  • Technologies list now names Hugo and Bun instead of "Node.js 20".

Verified with bun run lint:md and bun run format:check (both pass).

Note: the "Structure" section is still stale (it lists a pre-Hugo index.html/form.html/css//js/ layout). Left that out of scope here — happy to refresh it in a follow-up if you want.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

This project uses Bun for all JS tooling. Update the README's dev/build
commands (bun install / bun run dev / bun run build) and correct the
CI/deployment description, which still described a Node.js 20 + npm ci
pipeline — the actual GitHub Actions workflow sets up Bun and Hugo,
installs with bun install, lints/format-checks, and builds with
hugo --minify.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GMSEWRc8EtJUAeRWEJLw8u
@vpetersson
vpetersson merged commit 6e237a5 into master Jul 27, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants