Noresm2 1 develop chem test#540
Conversation
|
Duplicates PR #545 , but for |
Yes. |
|
@gold2718 - do you have a chance to look at this PR? I'm a bit concerned about the line but on the other hand, the suggested |
TomasTorsvik
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this PR only provides an optional setting for regression testing, I will approve it now. If a better solution is found, we can change this again later.
Summary: Test for checking functionality of --usr_mech_infile option for CAM_CONFIG_OPTS
Contributors: @annlew
Reviewers: @gold2718
Purpose of changes: Test to catch chemistry preprocessor failure
Github PR URL:
Changes made to build system: None
Changes made to the namelist: None
Changes to the defaults for the boundary datasets: None
Substantial timing or memory changes: None
Issues addressed by this PR:
cam_chempp issue with usr_mech_infile when path to compiler is too long (NorESMhub/CAM#160)
addresses NorESMhub/CAM#160