Skip to content

chore: trigger NVSkills CI for cuopt-install - #1672

Open
ramakrishnap-nv wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
chore/nvskills-ci-cuopt-install
Open

chore: trigger NVSkills CI for cuopt-install#1672
ramakrishnap-nv wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
chore/nvskills-ci-cuopt-install

Conversation

@ramakrishnap-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Trivial blank-line addition after SKILL.md frontmatter to trigger NVSkills CI — fetch updated skill card and benchmark for cuopt-install.

@ramakrishnap-nv
ramakrishnap-nv requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2026 20:32
@ramakrishnap-nv
ramakrishnap-nv requested a review from Iroy30 August 5, 2026 20:32
@ramakrishnap-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/nvskills-ci

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The cuOpt install skill refresh updates its benchmark report, skill-card metadata, documentation spacing, and Sigstore signature bundle. The benchmark now records regenerated evaluation results, validation findings, scoring rules, and freshness criteria.

Changes

cuOpt install skill refresh

Layer / File(s) Summary
Benchmark report refresh
skills/cuopt-install/BENCHMARK.md
The report records updated evaluation metadata, baseline-to-skill scores, validation findings, scoring methodology, and benchmark freshness criteria.
Skill-card metadata update
skills/cuopt-install/skill-card.md
The skill card updates cuOpt metadata, references, evaluator identifiers, metric descriptions, signals, and uplift results.
Formatting and signed artifacts
skills/cuopt-install/SKILL.md, skills/cuopt-install/skill.oms.sig
SKILL.md adds front-matter spacing. The signature bundle is regenerated for the updated skill artifacts.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • NVIDIA/cuopt#1671: Both PRs add front-matter spacing and regenerate related skill artifacts for different skills.
  • NVIDIA/cuopt#1673: Both PRs update front-matter spacing and evaluation artifacts.
  • NVIDIA/cuopt#1674: Both PRs add front-matter spacing for different cuOpt skills.

Suggested reviewers: iroy30, tmckayus

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the NVSkills CI trigger for the affected cuOpt installation skill.
Description check ✅ Passed The description accurately explains the blank-line change and the resulting updated skill card and benchmark.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/nvskills-ci-cuopt-install

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ramakrishnap-nv ramakrishnap-nv added improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change labels Aug 5, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CI Test Summary

⏭️ All 5 test job(s) skipped.

@ramakrishnap-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/nvskills-ci

Signed-off-by: nvskills-svc-account <svc-nvskills-signing@nvidia.com>
@copy-pr-bot

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@skills/cuopt-install/BENCHMARK.md`:
- Around line 74-87: Update the benchmark scoring documentation near the
dimension bands and overall verdict to define Overall as the arithmetic mean of
the five skill-assisted dimension scores, including the rounding rule and score
basis. State that the verdict gate uses these skill-assisted scores rather than
baseline values, while preserving the existing threshold and verdict rules.
- Around line 15-18: Update the benchmark report metadata in BENCHMARK.md to
identify the exact evaluated input file and task ID, specifically distinguishing
the Tier 3 dataset from the inst-eval-001-docker-server task. Reconcile the
Dataset digest and task count with the actual inputs evaluated, recording both
dataset details if both sources were used.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 71a63a7f-8e5b-40c8-83f9-3f5aaab8ee84

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b06074 and 751a554.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • skills/cuopt-install/BENCHMARK.md
  • skills/cuopt-install/skill-card.md
  • skills/cuopt-install/skill.oms.sig

Comment on lines +15 to +18
- Tasks: 1 evaluation tasks (1 positive)
- Dataset digest: `sha256:75bb16e95e852c956da6f5af155ac6936922740ae833f71436ddcb715da4b6df` (skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)
- Attempts per task: 1
- Pass threshold: 50%
- Overall verdict: PASS
- Environment: `k8s-sandbox`

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

python3 - <<'PY'
import json
from pathlib import Path

for name in (
    "skills/cuopt-install/benchmark/evals.json",
    "skills/cuopt-install/evals/evals.json",
):
    value = json.loads(Path(name).read_text())
    records = value if isinstance(value, list) else [value]
    print(name)
    for record in records:
        if isinstance(record, dict):
            print("  id:", record.get("id"))
PY

rg -n -C 3 \
  -e 'install-001-required-questions|inst-eval-001-docker-server|benchmark/evals\.json|evals/evals\.json|Tasks:|evaluation task' \
  skills/cuopt-install/BENCHMARK.md \
  skills/cuopt-install/skill-card.md

Repository: NVIDIA/cuopt

Length of output: 1958


🏁 Script executed:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

printf '%s\n' '--- BENCHMARK.md ---'
cat -n skills/cuopt-install/BENCHMARK.md

printf '%s\n' '--- benchmark/evals.json records ---'
python3 - <<'PY'
import json
from pathlib import Path

for name in (
    "skills/cuopt-install/benchmark/evals.json",
    "skills/cuopt-install/evals/evals.json",
):
    print(f"\n{name}")
    value = json.loads(Path(name).read_text())
    records = value if isinstance(value, list) else [value]
    for record in records:
        print(json.dumps(record, sort_keys=True, indent=2))
PY

printf '%s\n' '--- related benchmark metadata and references ---'
rg -n -C 4 \
  -e '75bb16e|skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot|install-001-required-questions|inst-eval-001-docker-server|benchmark/evals\.json|evals/evals\.json|dataset|digest|Tier 3|Overall|Freshness' \
  skills/cuopt-install .github 2>/dev/null || true

Repository: NVIDIA/cuopt

Length of output: 29978


🏁 Script executed:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

printf '%s\n' '--- skill-card evaluation section ---'
cat -n skills/cuopt-install/skill-card.md | sed -n '40,90p'

printf '%s\n' '--- repository references to the two evaluation inputs ---'
rg -n -C 5 \
  -e 'skills/cuopt-install/(benchmark/evals\.json|evals/evals\.json)' \
  -e 'benchmark/evals\.json|evals/evals\.json' \
  -e 'inst-eval-001-docker-server|install-001-required-questions' \
  --glob '!skills/cuopt-install/benchmark/evals.json' \
  --glob '!skills/cuopt-install/evals/evals.json' \
  .

printf '%s\n' '--- candidate dataset digests ---'
python3 - <<'PY'
import hashlib
from pathlib import Path

for name in (
    "skills/cuopt-install/benchmark/evals.json",
    "skills/cuopt-install/evals/evals.json",
):
    data = Path(name).read_bytes()
    print(name)
    print("  raw sha256:", hashlib.sha256(data).hexdigest())
    print("  normalized-json sha256:",
          hashlib.sha256(
              __import__("json").dumps(
                  __import__("json").loads(data),
                  sort_keys=True,
                  separators=(",", ":"),
              ).encode()
          ).hexdigest())
PY

Repository: NVIDIA/cuopt

Length of output: 3080


Record the Tier 3 dataset and task ID.

skills/cuopt-install/benchmark/evals.json contains 15 tasks, while skills/cuopt-install/evals/evals.json contains inst-eval-001-docker-server. The report lists one task but identifies neither input nor task ID. Add the exact input file and task ID, and reconcile the dataset digest if both inputs were evaluated.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@skills/cuopt-install/BENCHMARK.md` around lines 15 - 18, Update the benchmark
report metadata in BENCHMARK.md to identify the exact evaluated input file and
task ID, specifically distinguishing the Tier 3 dataset from the
inst-eval-001-docker-server task. Reconcile the Dataset digest and task count
with the actual inputs evaluated, recording both dataset details if both sources
were used.

Comment on lines +74 to +87
| Dimension | Question | Scored signals |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Is it safe to use? | `security` (100%) |
| Correctness | Is the answer correct? | `accuracy` (100%) |
| Discoverability | Was the right skill loaded when needed? | `skill_execution` (100%) |
| Effectiveness | Did the skill help complete the task? | `goal_accuracy` (50%) + `behavior_check` (50%) |
| Efficiency | Did it avoid wasted tool or skill usage? | `skill_efficiency` (100%) |

- MEDIUM SCHEMA/body_recommended_section: Missing recommended section: '## Instructions' (`skills/cuopt-install/SKILL.md`)
- MEDIUM SCHEMA/body_recommended_section: Missing recommended section: '## Examples' (`skills/cuopt-install/SKILL.md`)
- LOW SCHEMA/unexpected_file: Unexpected 'benchmark' in skill root (`skills/cuopt-install/benchmark`)
- LOW SCHEMA/author_format: Author must be of the form 'Name <email@host>' (`skills/cuopt-install/SKILL.md`)
- Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
- Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
- Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
- The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
- Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (`goal_accuracy`) and expected workflow adherence (`behavior_check`).
- Token efficiency is a separate report-only signal. It does not change a dimension score or the overall verdict.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Document the overall-score formula and gate input.

The report defines dimension thresholds and the verdict gate, but it does not define how Overall is derived from the five dimensions or whether the thresholds use baseline or skill-assisted scores. The displayed values imply an arithmetic mean, and both baseline efficiency values are 0%; without this rule, readers cannot reproduce the Overall values or the PASS decision. Add the aggregation formula, rounding rule, and explicit skill-assisted-score basis.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@skills/cuopt-install/BENCHMARK.md` around lines 74 - 87, Update the benchmark
scoring documentation near the dimension bands and overall verdict to define
Overall as the arithmetic mean of the five skill-assisted dimension scores,
including the rounding rule and score basis. State that the verdict gate uses
these skill-assisted scores rather than baseline values, while preserving the
existing threshold and verdict rules.

@ramakrishnap-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/ok to test 751a554

@ramakrishnap-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/ok to test 1495865

@ramakrishnap-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/ok to test d22f2fd

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants