Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Inconsistency: validation should reject zero in addition to negative sizes.
The check
< 0allowserror_string_size == 0, but this conflicts with:#1311,#1313, and#1403explicitly require rejecting "non-positive sizes (<= 0)".cuOptGetParameterat line 882 rejectsparameter_value_size <= 0, not just< 0.A zero-size buffer is technically valid for
std::snprintfbut not useful—callers receive an unmodified buffer. For consistency with requirements and the existing validation pattern in this file, the check should beerror_string_size <= 0.🔧 Align validation with requirements and existing pattern
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not a big deal. We just want to avoid the dangerous case where a negative size is passed to snprintf.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mlubin, understood — the PR description already notes that zero is technically acceptable, and the fix targets only the unsafe negative case. That makes sense. Acknowledged!✏️ Learnings added
🧠 Learnings used