-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
fix: handle zero-temperature rescaling #350
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
galjos
wants to merge
9
commits into
dev
Choose a base branch
from
fix/zero-temperature-rescaling
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0e0b2aa
fix: handle zero-temperature rescaling
galjos 9959fc4
merge: update from dev
galjos 43b253c
chore: add required changelog fragment
galjos 6b3468a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/dev' into fix/zero-temperature-r…
galjos ce2db3f
chore: migrate zero-temperature changelog fragment
galjos 0fecf54
merge: update zero-temperature fix with dev
galjos cc9ed25
style: format thermostat test includes
galjos 48eabb8
merge: dev into fix/zero-temperature-rescaling
galjos 912d0c8
merge: latest dev into fix/zero-temperature-rescaling
galjos File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| - Zero-temperature rescaling remains finite and rejects positive targets that cannot be reached from zero kinetic energy. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about updating this second if-statement condition to
if (isZero(_temperature) && !isZero(targetTemp))then you could omit the first if all together
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That condition is correct for the error case, but the first branch cannot simply be removed: when both the current and target temperatures are zero, the remaining
sqrt(targetTemp / _temperature)evaluates0 / 0and produces NaN. The explicit zero-target path also guarantees that all velocities are set exactly to zero before temperature, momentum, and angular momentum are recalculated. We would need a separate explicit zero/zero path even if the branches were consolidated.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right, my proposal is not the solution, but what about this:
Leaving the first
if, and re-writing the error message for the secondif, then I think al 4 cases are correctly covered:targetTempis 0,_temperatureis 0: error messagetargetTempis not 0,_temperatureis 0: error messagetargetTempis 0,_temperatureis not 0: lambda is correctly evaluated to 0targetTempis not 0,_temperatureis not 0: lambda is correctly calculated