Skip to content

🧹 [Code Health] Remove unused agent imports in search_agent.py - #54

Closed
MingfengHong wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
code-health-unused-agent-imports-9943879089987859184
Closed

🧹 [Code Health] Remove unused agent imports in search_agent.py#54
MingfengHong wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
code-health-unused-agent-imports-9943879089987859184

Conversation

@MingfengHong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: The code health issue addressed
Removed unused imports LiteratureSearchAgent and WosSearchAgent from paperseek/search_agent.py. Updated paperseek/__init__.py to import these directly from paperseek_core.agent to maintain backwards compatibility in the public API.

💡 Why: How this improves maintainability
Removing unused imports is low-risk, improves code clarity, and reduces dead code.

Verification: How you confirmed the change is safe
Ran ruff check and the full test suite python -m pytest tests/ which all passed, confirming that the public API remains unchanged and the codebase functions properly.

Result: The improvement achieved
Improved code health in paperseek/search_agent.py while ensuring zero breakage to downstream code that imports from paperseek.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 9943879089987859184 started by @MingfengHong

Removed unused `LiteratureSearchAgent` and `WosSearchAgent` aliases from `paperseek/search_agent.py` to improve code clarity. Updated `paperseek/__init__.py` to import these aliases directly from `paperseek_core.agent` to preserve the public API for backwards compatibility.

Co-authored-by: MingfengHong <76680753+MingfengHong@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 8, 2026 09:14

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants