MVP for dedicated Workers project - #871
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Partially addresses #786.
This has a number of changes that will be required for making Refresh more scalable, as well as generalizing the implementation to support jobs that have unique lifetimes (e.g. those who do not need to repeat constantly, or run every tick, or only once on startup).
IWorkeris nowWorkerJob. Henceforth "Worker" will refer to the process running these "Job"s.WorkerJobis now inRefresh.WorkersExpiringObjectJobstay in the interface project.RepeatingJobwhich is the old behavior. I've introducedStartupJobas well, or you can use the defaultWorkerJobwhich runs every tick by default.Refresh.WorkerManagerproject was introduced. This simply runs a WorkerManager, but lacks any ability to configure it. I will complete this in a follow-up PR.