Skip to content

The "delta" field in the Stamag table. Is that correct? #71

Description

@dimag1978

According to the description you refer to (Anderson, J., Farrell, W. E., Garcia, K., Given, J., and Swanger, H. (1990). Center for Seismic Studies version 3 database: Schema reference manual. Technical Report C90-01, Center for Seismic Studies, 1300 N. 17th Street, Suite 1450, Arlington, Virginia 22209-3871.) there is no delta field in the Stamag table. In your class it exists:

class Stamag(Base):
     __abstract__ = True

     @declared_attr
     def __table_args__(cls):
         return (PrimaryKeyConstraint('magid', 'sta'),)

     magid = dc(magid)
     sta = dc(sta)
     arid = dc(arid)
     orid = dc(orid)
     evid=dc(evid)
     phase = dc(phase)
     delta = dc(delta)
     magtype = dc(magtype)
     magnitude = dc(magnitude)
     uncertainty = dc(uncertainty)
     auth = dc(auth)
     commid = dc(commid)
     lddate = dc(lddate)

I use the CSS3.0 format.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions