Skip to content

Mark DAPNETGateway as pinned, and drop the retired bridges from the todo - #16

Merged
kn4oqw-clint merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/dapnet-shipped
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

Mark DAPNETGateway as pinned, and drop the retired bridges from the todo#16
kn4oqw-clint merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/dapnet-shipped

Conversation

@kn4oqw-clint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The pin table read pending for DAPNETGateway and the CI paragraph listed it as to-build, three weeks after #15 pinned it at 5527546, built it for all three arches, and published it to the signed repo. A reader deciding whether POCSAG has a daemon would have concluded it does not.

The same paragraph listed the MMDVM_CM cross-mode bridges as still to pin/build. Those are not pending, they are cancelled — waypoint retired the per-bridge surface in favour of the RFC-0003 bus, so the binaries will never be needed. Said explicitly rather than deleted, because "why is MMDVM_CM missing" is a question this README should answer.

APRSGateway and MMDVMCal remain genuinely pending and are untouched. Pin verified against pins.env (DAPNETGATEWAY_SHA=552754628f29…).

Part of the KN4OQW/waypoint#33 closeout.

The pin table still read "pending" for DAPNETGateway and the CI paragraph still
listed it as to-build, three weeks after #15 pinned it at 5527546, built it for
all three arches, and published it to the signed repo. A reader deciding whether
POCSAG has a daemon would have concluded it does not.

The same paragraph listed the MMDVM_CM cross-mode bridges as still to pin/build.
Those are not pending, they are cancelled: waypoint retired the per-bridge
surface in favour of the RFC-0003 bus, so the binaries will never be needed.
Saying so explicitly, rather than deleting the line, because "why is MMDVM_CM
missing" is a question this README should answer.

APRSGateway and MMDVMCal remain genuinely pending and are left as they were.
@kn4oqw-clint
kn4oqw-clint merged commit 23f8654 into main Aug 2, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant