Explain disclosure holds and review the October 8 candidates

[JunjoSick]

The October 8 daily run used ambiguous-disclosure for every recent non-blocked article, including articles with no advertising disclosure. That made its 77-row queue look more suspicious than the underlying evidence.

This PR adds precise review diagnostics and documents the completed 77-path investigation:

• GDC: 5 publisher-disclosed advertisements, recommended for a separate reviewed exact-path addition.
• QuiAntella: 27 ordinary editorial articles and 2 unresolved retail-opening features; no confirmed ads.
• Colli: 42 ordinary editorial articles and 1 unavailable article; no confirmed ads.

All 77 paths are absent from the current registries. Current RSS/API fragments were recovered for 76 candidates. Old and new classifiers returned identical decisions for all 76. GDC has three overlapping causes: styled PRE labels on all five, linked attribution footers on all five, and gallery STYLE elements on three.

Changes:

• Report missing supported disclosure, active content, unsupported label context, and unsafe following content separately.
• Forward diagnostics through the existing worker and discovery report.
• Add invented regression cases, including the layered GDC shape, hidden/quoted evidence, 599/600-character boundary, later valid labels, and byte-stable publication outputs for held candidates.
• Include primary URLs, per-candidate assessments, source fingerprints, limitations, and narrowly scoped follow-up recommendations in the review report.

The accepted disclosure predicate, vocabulary, active-content veto, resource limits, timestamps, conflicts, and publisher gates are preserved. No baseline/state/registry/filter changes; no automatic publication of the recommendations. The 69 editorial assessments are evidence-based descriptions, not permanent keep overrides or proof that undisclosed payment never occurred.

Validation:

• Focused article-card tests: 30/30 passed.
• Current-body comparison: 76/76 unchanged decisions.
• npm run cards:check, npm run check, bundle history verification and whitespace checks passed.
• Full local suite: 125 passed; the required browser test could not run because Chromium is unavailable locally. The attempted Playwright download was invalid.
• GitHub CI passed, including the mandatory Chromium/browser lifecycle test and generated-output/history checks: https://github.com/JunjoSick/filtershosting/actions/runs/37916910885

Source workflow: https://github.com/JunjoSick/filtershosting/actions/runs/37775388864