Skip to content

Add comprehensive documentation and rulebook for TapeReading WDO/WIN automation - #2

Open
JClemente-web wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/create-tape-reading-tool-for-profitpro-cni2az
Open

Add comprehensive documentation and rulebook for TapeReading WDO/WIN automation#2
JClemente-web wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/create-tape-reading-tool-for-profitpro-cni2az

Conversation

@JClemente-web

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Motivation

  • Provide a professional, auditable foundation to design, research, implement and operate a Tape Reading automation for ProfitPro with primary focus on WDO and secondary support for WIN.
  • Capture product vision, operational rulebook, research protocol, and production blueprint to ensure any automation follows traceable sources, tests and risk controls.
  • Standardize definitions, confluences and investigation artifacts so rules can be validated before any execution with capital.

Description

  • Add top-level README.md plus a comprehensive docs/ folder containing the product vision, MVP roadmap, production blueprint, execution rulebook, professional requirements, research/investigation templates, and a long list of reference and operational documents.
  • Include operational artifacts such as execution-rulebook.md, production-automation-blueprint.md, professional-requirements.md, research-confluence-matrix.md, research-investigation-protocol.md, and senior-execution-plan.md to define states, entry/exit/protection rules and audit fields.
  • Add research and traceability files including profitpro-ntsl-research-map.md, source-search-log.md, references.md, wdo-research-questions.md and mvp-roadmap.md to map required platform capabilities, sources and 100 investigation questions for WDO.
  • Provide domain-specific guidance documents such as tape-reading-wdo.md, big-players-and-market-map.md and macro-news-risk.md to align data needs, player scoring, news/correlation filters and blocking windows.

Testing

  • This PR introduces documentation only and did not include automated code changes, so no automated tests were executed.
  • No CI test failures were applicable because the change is content addition of markdown files only.
  • Future work should include adding markdown linting or CI checks and linking documentation validation into the pipeline.

Codex Task

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant