Skip to content

docs: gRPC-only OTLP, Windows 11, and availability targets - #130

Open
dankoverride wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
lovelace/doc-fixes-otlp-win11-availability
Open

dankoverride wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
lovelace/doc-fixes-otlp-win11-availability

Conversation

@dankoverride

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Three docs corrections.

OTLP: gRPC only

  • Instrument overview, language pages, Collector, Kubernetes and the OpenTelemetry concept page now state that DeepCube accepts OTLP over gRPC only, and that OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_PROTOCOL must be grpc.
  • Java examples set the protocol explicitly, since agent 2.x and the Spring Boot starter default to http/protobuf. The Go autoexport note says the same.
  • Node.js: removed the advice to switch to an HTTP exporter behind a proxy.
  • Kubernetes: the direct Instrumentation is Node.js only; Java, Python, .NET and Go go through a Collector, because the Operator defaults them to http/protobuf.
  • Web Troubleshooting: browser exporters must go through a backend Collector.

Windows 11, 64-bit

3D and Studio requirement pages now list Windows 11 64-bit.

Plans: availability targets

"Uptime SLA" is renamed "Availability target", with a footnote pointing to the Subscription Agreement.

Checks

  • mkdocs build --strict passes locally.
  • The Kubernetes Operator-through-Collector setup has not been run on a live cluster.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Bug 3907: ingest accepts OTLP over gRPC only. Remove every claim that
OTLP over HTTP is supported and the Node.js proxy advice, set the
protocol explicitly where the SDK default is http/protobuf (Java agent,
Spring Boot starter, Go autoexport), and split the Kubernetes Operator
example so Java, Python, .NET and Go go through a Collector.

Work item 3931: Windows 10 is dropped, the supported client is Windows
11, 64-bit.

Plans: 99 / 99.9 / 99.99% are availability targets, not an uptime SLA.
Only Visualize carries a contractual 99.0%.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@dankoverride
dankoverride requested a review from ETWOYA as a code owner November 7, 2026 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant