R/Python Interoperability documentation - #225
Closed
Artur-man wants to merge 986 commits into
Closed
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Michael Stadler <stadler.michael@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charlotte Soneson <charlottesoneson@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Samuel Gunz <samuel@gunz.ch>
Use duckspatial instead of arrow for ShapeFrame and PointFrame
Co-authored-by: Michael Stadler <stadler.michael@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charlotte Soneson <charlottesoneson@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Samuel Gunz <samuel@gunz.ch>
Implement query function for PointFrame
Co-authored-by: Michael Stadler <stadler.michael@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charlotte Soneson <charlottesoneson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Stadler <stadler.michael@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charlotte Soneson <charlottesoneson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Stadler <stadler.michael@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charlotte Soneson <charlottesoneson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Stadler <stadler.michael@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charlotte Soneson <charlottesoneson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Stadler <stadler.michael@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charlotte Soneson <charlottesoneson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Stadler <stadler.michael@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charlotte Soneson <charlottesoneson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Stadler <stadler.michael@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charlotte Soneson <charlottesoneson@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Samuel Gunz <samuel@gunz.ch>
Use dedicated base R functions to simplify some code patterns
* use BiocGenerics::table * fix R CMD check note re: sf::st_point * v0.99.38
* revise validity to accept >2/3D * revise ome(ro) version retrieval * make use of new BiocGenerics * move EBImage to Suggests:, remove paws * minimal list of authors until further discussion
* use prototyped S4Vectors::SimpleList as slots * new path() method to retrieve on-disk file paths * more tests & validity * bump to v0.99.39
Artur-man
marked this pull request as draft
May 31, 2026 16:32
Owner
|
Thanks for this effort, really important!! If it's not crazy long, how about a section in the main vignette? I think a separate doc will more easily be missed |
Collaborator
Author
|
Absolutely, let me play with it to make it look better. When done, I would be happy with it going anywhere you see fit. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A separate vignette showcasing R/Python API comparison.