Repository navigation
Require proactive process reporting and owned dispositions - #4735
Merged
EHotwagner merged 4 commits intoOct 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
EHotwagner
deleted the
routine/proactive-process-feedback-4733-20261020
branch
October 20, 2026 10:06
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make material process-problem reporting part of ordinary execution, review completion, worker return and handoff. Canonical work-board, work-board-coord, worker findings and show-progress now require prompt evidence-grounded reports and a reasoned root disposition with an unresolved owner, next action and reconsideration condition.
Reports separate observation from hypothesis; a missing solution does not suppress a valid problem. Existing owning issues, direct filing rights and independent review remain authoritative. No reporting worker, duplicate ledger, automatic filing, recurring unchanged report or new dispatch/Status/retry/closure authority is introduced.
The fourteen mirrored guidance paths retain the independently reviewed authoring bytes. Root used the maintained generator for Atlas seeds, both manifests, registry digests and locks. The existing historical4641 changelog entry was moved verbatim below Entries before older entries after the maintained writer exposed its misplaced position; no history was dropped. One new scoped Atlas contract cites five exact source hashes and preserves all baseline records.
Validation: independent integrated review PASS at this exact25-file head;106 maintained lifecycle controls and filing checks; actual receiver-safe links with repository-pinned PyYAML6.0.3; mirror/scope/Atlas citation/history and generated-closure checks; diff hygiene. The actual ordinary reporting and disposition example is recorded and independently read back in #4733 . Required exact-head CI, source delivery and applicable instruction adoption remain acceptance gates; this source PR does not close the issue or claim publication/fleet adoption.
The first exact-head CI found a canonical analyst-custody wording mismatch. The same PR restores its preexisting two mirrored lines and refreshes only the derived manifest; the proactive findings section, Atlas and guard remain unchanged. Maintained analyst/filing/lifecycle controls pass and independent exact5340c356 repair review passes. Original failure is retained; final exact-head CI remains required.