[EHotwagner]

Closes #2907

Summary

• adds explicit --add, --remove, --replace, and --clear intents for the set-valued Blocked by field
• serializes every authoritative Blocked by writer behind one server-ordered issue-comment lease: explicit intents, batch, release, intake, reconcile, and deferred flush replay all join the same boundary
• refuses legacy bare replacement and adds diagnostic-only BLOCKED-BY-BODY-INERT linting for empty, divergent, duplicate, or invalid body projections
• migrates the production parity route to explicit replacement/clear syntax

Verification

• dotnet build src/FS.GG.Coord.Cli/FS.GG.Coord.Cli.fsproj -c Release --no-restore: 0 warnings, 0 errors on the rebased recovery head
• BoardOps tests: 259 passed; GitHub tests: 671 passed; parity corpus: 616/616; production write corpus: 186/186
• focused controls prove one derived first attempt is fenced, retry preserves both edges, maximum concurrent actions remains one, and a lower-ID contender prevents batch/release/flush bypass with zero board mutations and exactly one retained deferred entry
• scripts/generate-projections --check: current
• fsgg-sdd analyze: implementationReady; verify: verificationReady with 14/14 observed obligations; ship: shipReady
• the earlier full branch verification also covered Kernel, Lifecycle, CLI, Core, parity, identity-harness, signature-doc mutation sweep, and deterministic package checks
• eight bounded inversions observed red: add preservation, remove preservation, stale refusal, inert-body lint, mutation-lease election, direct-writer lease bypass, deferred-flush lease bypass, and the paired intake/reconcile lease-wire ordering inversion (184/186, exactly those two routes red)

Verification: exact commands, outcomes, controls, and inversion evidence are recorded in work/2907-blocked-by-set-mutations/verification/verification-evidence.md; the durable 259-test TRX is readiness/2907-blocked-by-set-mutations/test-results/boardops.trx.

Recovery

This supersedes #2916 in the same recovery lineage. Its expired, unconsumed review wait was bound to the dead claim generation, and the typed force-claim route correctly recovered the item while the known #2853 ledger defect prevented that old PR from consuming or replacing the wait. A fresh PR is the documented safe recovery because review-wait authority is scoped to PR comments. Successor-critic findings on this PR were repaired on the exact current head.

The branch was rebased onto current origin/main, and its SDD generated views were refreshed with fsgg-sdd 1.2.5. The prior #2912 dependency and coherent-set 0.75.2 release are already landed and verified; this PR itself declares no delivery obligation.

[EHotwagner]

No description provided.

[EHotwagner]

{"claimGeneration":"5406278215","enteredAt":"2026-08-25T06:17:48.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"enter","evidenceRef":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936","expiresAt":"2026-08-25T10:17:48.0000000\u002B00:00","item":"FS-GG/.github#2907","kind":"initial-review","reviewGeneration":"ded5b50850568537153813fac65c175535ddd3d4:initial-review:0","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[github-actions]

✅ This PR stays inside the touch-set its issue declared.

[EHotwagner]

{"at":"2026-08-25T06:23:31.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"cancel","evidenceRef":"hosted parity-fixture repair before critic record","reviewGeneration":"ded5b50850568537153813fac65c175535ddd3d4:initial-review:0","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[EHotwagner]

{"claimGeneration":"5406278215","enteredAt":"2026-08-25T06:24:50.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"enter","evidenceRef":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936","expiresAt":"2026-08-25T10:24:50.0000000\u002B00:00","item":"FS-GG/.github#2907","kind":"initial-review","reviewGeneration":"02d5a50ba8cf14192655bd40f5179d8baad3f9ee:initial-review:0","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[EHotwagner]

{"acceptedExceptions":[],"baseSha":null,"claimGeneration":null,"critic":"shrike-4035","diffAuditReceipts":[],"diffAuditRequired":false,"digest":"7eb47e320071417f4fc6ecd78f38b8e66b6d1bcdd71f356ae6d0ecbd904d320e","headSha":"02d5a50ba8cf14192655bd40f5179d8baad3f9ee","initialReview":null,"kind":"initial","policyVersion":"structured-decisions/1","precedingReview":null,"previousDigest":null,"repairPhaseReceipt":null,"revision":1,"round":0,"routeApplicability":"meaningful","routeEvidence":["Built artifact: exact-head Release build of src/FS.GG.Coord.Cli/bin/Release/net10.0/fsgg-coord-engine at 02d5a50; launcher SHA-256 f7dc79059479edcdaacaa79d6bcb0f96bef311a7f52331f51c29e8041e526153 and DLL SHA-256 1f334640469ceb00b8f8198c88043e8a264b66c4a4eb7b1cffa0f35d91338406. Verification: dotnet build src/FS.GG.Coord.Cli/FS.GG.Coord.Cli.fsproj -c Release completed with 0 warnings and 0 errors in the detached exact-head worktree.","Executed command: against the production HTTP adapter and the instrumented blockedby parity server, the compiled engine ran set-field --worker critic-route FS.GG.SDD#42 \u0027Blocked by\u0027 --replace \u0027#290\u0027, then set-field --batch --worker critic-route FS.GG.SDD#42 \u0027Blocked by=#299\u0027. The first command posted one REST mutation-lease comment; the second mutated Blocked by while the cumulative lease-post count remained one. Verification: both commands exited 0; the server recorded the first set to FS-GG/FS.GG.SDD#290 and the second aliased field mutation; temporary observation-only instrumentation was removed and git diff --exit-code was clean afterward.","Compared routes: explicit set-field Blocked-by mutations enter Writes.withBlockedByMutationLease at Handlers.fs:575, while the production batch replacement route proceeds through setFieldBatchCmd and boardWriteBatch at Handlers.fs:593-690 without entering that lease; release --blocked-by is a second production bypass through Board.boardWrite at Client.fs:5484-5525. Verification: rg -n \u0027withBlockedByMutationLease\u0027 over src and tests found the production call only at Handlers.fs:575, alongside the declaration/signature and one test call; exact-head source inspection found the named batch and release writers.","Observed result: CHANGES REQUIRED. Material finding 1: the new comment lease serializes only callers using the explicit set-field mutation route, not every production writer of the same authoritative Blocked by field. A batch or release replacement can therefore mutate after boardWriteGuarded\u0027s re-read at Board.fs:1463-1473 and before its unconditional Projects-v2 mutation; the derived add/remove can then overwrite that intervening value, so no serial order explains the result and issue acceptance for atomic add/remove/concurrent-change safety remains unmet. Route all authoritative Blocked-by writers through the same serialization boundary or provide real server-side conditional authority, and add a discriminating interleaving test against at least one bypass route. Material finding 2: the required SDD front-half still specifies the refuted read-then-write design: clarifications.md DEC-002 and plan.md PD-003 call the immediate re-read the solution and do not describe the subsequently added lease or its all-writer invariant. The generated verify receipt also carries VF001 because evidence.yml pins analysis.json as 3ae6df877929bd095ea483ed27cced27a3a43bcfe0acd2c4ada8c1b5411888ad while the exact file is 38a2c866a5b712987a139f889e06969751a270028812b7fa4e61bf9b6a9c805e. Update the SDD decisions/plan/tasks and regenerate evidence/analyze/verify/ship so the governing design and source snapshots describe the repaired mechanism. Other exact-head checks passed: BoardOps 257/257, GitHub 671/671, parity 616/616 with 0 not measured, check-parity-fixtures 46/46, verify-paths OK, effective base 712f025, obligations-none comment 5406348970 binds the head, PR body has zero edits, and issue body edits all predate current claim generation 5406278215. The two current CI failures are the expected pre-authorization claim-generation/claim-fence gates; at census time 42 checks passed, 2 were in progress, 2 expected failures, and 1 skipped across all 47 check-runs. No mechanically discovered semantic rename requires diff audit. This decision does not accept, merge, authorize, publish, or fulfill delivery."],"schema":"fsgg.coord.review-decision/v2","subject":"#2907/pr/2936","succession":null,"timestamp":"2026-08-25T06:35:01Z","verdict":"changes-required"}

[EHotwagner]

{"at":"2026-08-25T06:36:09.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"complete","evidenceRef":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406502532","reviewGeneration":"02d5a50ba8cf14192655bd40f5179d8baad3f9ee:initial-review:0","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[EHotwagner]

{"claimGeneration":"5406278215","enteredAt":"2026-08-25T06:58:03.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"enter","evidenceRef":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936","expiresAt":"2026-08-25T10:58:03.0000000\u002B00:00","item":"FS-GG/.github#2907","kind":"repair-confirmation","reviewGeneration":"6cd87934b3dfc239da337e5b6f469b377323fc86:repair-confirmation:1","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[EHotwagner]

{"acceptedExceptions":[],"baseSha":null,"claimGeneration":null,"critic":"curlew-5907","diffAuditReceipts":[],"diffAuditRequired":false,"digest":"32cbc237c3f5d125b0cb2602c1ec84009a9c7f8e71875fe17c4633bba6844d48","headSha":"6cd87934b3dfc239da337e5b6f469b377323fc86","initialReview":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406502532","kind":"confirmation","policyVersion":"structured-decisions/1","precedingReview":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406502532","previousDigest":"7eb47e320071417f4fc6ecd78f38b8e66b6d1bcdd71f356ae6d0ecbd904d320e","repairPhaseReceipt":null,"revision":2,"round":1,"routeApplicability":"meaningful","routeEvidence":["Built artifact: exact-head Release build of src/FS.GG.Coord.Cli/bin/Release/net10.0/fsgg-coord-engine at 6cd8793; launcher SHA-256 f7dc79059479edcdaacaa79d6bcb0f96bef311a7f52331f51c29e8041e526153 and DLL SHA-256 f6ad2c4e3e6713a65fd40a5e392ac19717e867fb2b234c72008f4a6b7473ca88. Verification: dotnet test tests/FS.GG.Coord.Cli.BoardOps.Tests/FS.GG.Coord.Cli.BoardOps.Tests.fsproj -c Release built the exact detached head and passed 258/258 tests; git diff --exit-code remained clean outside build outputs.","Executed command: against tests/coord-engine-parity/blockedby_server.py, I installed live lower-ID mutation-lease comment 1000, placed one production-shaped deferred queue entry for FS-GG/FS.GG.SDD#42 field \u0027Blocked by\u0027, then ran the compiled exact-head engine\u0027s flush command with that cache. It exited 0 and reported \u0027replayed 1 of 1 queued write(s)\u0027. A direct set-field --batch Blocked-by replacement against the same active lease exited 1 with \u0027lease is held by comment 1000; no board mutation was sent\u0027. Verification: GET /_writes after both commands returned exactly one mutation, the flush replay setting Blocked by to FS-GG/FS.GG.SDD#299, while the active contender comment remained present.","Compared routes: the repaired direct routes are wrapped by withBlockedByLeaseForWrites/Writes.withBlockedByMutationLease in Handlers.fs:483-490, 718-719, 2269-2279 and Client.fs:43-50, 2986-2990, 5540-5541. The deferred route is created by Board.boardWrite/boardWriteBatch at Board.fs:1398-1433 and 1513-1534, but Board.flush replays each entry directly through private attempt at Board.fs:1662-1678 without acquiring or checking the Blocked-by mutation lease. Verification: rg -n \u0027Board\.boardWriteBatch|Board\.boardWrite|Blocked by\u0027 over src plus exact-head source inspection; the production-route execution above discriminated the direct and deferred paths under the same live contender.","Observed result: CHANGES REQUIRED. Material finding 1: the repair still does not serialize every authoritative Blocked-by writer. Any explicit replace/clear, batch, release, or reconcile write that is rate-limited is queued while the lease is held, then the lease is released; a later flush replays that unconditional set/clear through Board.attempt without the lease. The executed comparison proved flush mutated under an active lower-ID contender while the direct batch route correctly refused. A flush can therefore land between a derived writer\u0027s observation and mutation and be overwritten, violating AC-003/FR-003 and the PR body\u0027s \u0027every authoritative writer\u0027 claim. Route Blocked-by replay through the same lease (with queue behavior that cannot duplicate/drop entries), or make Blocked-by writes non-deferrable and require re-derivation; add a named flush-vs-derived interleaving inversion and update/regenerate the SDD fixed point to include this authority route. Material finding 2: the current PR body carries fsgg:pr-authorization grant=5406718363/opkey=d163d676... for this exact head even though live review remains state awaitingSuccessorReview/action dispatchSuccessor and no confirmation or host acceptance exists. body-edits reports the authorization edit at 2026-08-25T07:01:05Z. pnext-item section 6 permits the live delivery authorization call only immediately after host acceptance; the premature current-head grant causes the edited-trigger claim-generation/claim-fence producers to evaluate an otherwise unreviewed head as authorized. Remove the marker so the edited workflows revoke it, and create a fresh authorization only through the documented post-acceptance delivery call. The repair otherwise closes the initial direct-writer and stale-SDD findings: current spec/clarifications/plan/tasks hashes agree with the generated views, verificationReady/shipReady are current, FSGG-PATHS is OK, obligations-none comment 5406348970 binds this head, and no semantic rename requires diff audit. This decision does not accept, merge, authorize, publish, or fulfill delivery."],"schema":"fsgg.coord.review-decision/v2","subject":"#2907/pr/2936","succession":null,"timestamp":"2026-08-25T07:05:42Z","verdict":"changes-required"}

[EHotwagner]

{"at":"2026-08-25T07:06:34.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"complete","evidenceRef":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406768001","reviewGeneration":"6cd87934b3dfc239da337e5b6f469b377323fc86:repair-confirmation:1","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[EHotwagner]

{"claimGeneration":"5406278215","enteredAt":"2026-08-25T07:19:58.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"enter","evidenceRef":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936","expiresAt":"2026-08-25T11:19:58.0000000\u002B00:00","item":"FS-GG/.github#2907","kind":"repair-confirmation","reviewGeneration":"9f3149e286879a8da9fbff0671afdbf385c70f82:repair-confirmation:2","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[EHotwagner]

{"acceptedExceptions":[],"baseSha":null,"claimGeneration":null,"critic":"snipe-8da1","diffAuditReceipts":[],"diffAuditRequired":false,"digest":"e669cf93646719c47b6e448a644cf17ca1f63fc0da02ecc783fa48d0ef830059","headSha":"9f3149e286879a8da9fbff0671afdbf385c70f82","initialReview":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406502532","kind":"confirmation","policyVersion":"structured-decisions/1","precedingReview":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406768001","previousDigest":"32cbc237c3f5d125b0cb2602c1ec84009a9c7f8e71875fe17c4633bba6844d48","repairPhaseReceipt":null,"revision":3,"round":2,"routeApplicability":"meaningful","routeEvidence":["Built artifact: exact-head Release fsgg-coord-engine and BoardOps test assembly at 9f3149e. Verification: dotnet test tests/FS.GG.Coord.Cli.BoardOps.Tests/FS.GG.Coord.Cli.BoardOps.Tests.fsproj -c Release rebuilt the detached head and passed 259/259; the focused repaired flush test passed after restoration, and git diff --exit-code was clean.","Executed command: against tests/coord-engine-parity/blockedby_server.py, I posted live lower-ID mutation-lease comment 1000, installed one production-shaped deferred Blocked by entry, then ran the compiled engine\u0027s set-field --batch replacement and flush commands with the same cache. Both exited 1 under contention. Verification: GET /_writes returned an empty writes array; pending.jsonl retained exactly one line; flush reported replayed 0 of 1 and no duplicate appended.","Compared routes: every authoritative direct Blocked by route is wrapped through withBlockedByLeaseForWrites or Writes.withBlockedByMutationLease in Handlers.fs and Client.fs, while Board.flush now reacquires Writes.withBlockedByMutationLease before replaying a queued Blocked by entry through attempt. Verification: exact-head rg/source census of every Board.boardWrite, Board.boardWriteBatch, and Board.boardWriteGuarded call plus the executed direct-batch versus deferred-flush comparison; FSGG-PATHS reported OK.","Observed result: PASS. The flush repair closes round 1 comment 5406768001: lower-ID contention causes zero field mutations, the unlanded entry remains queued once, and disabling only the replay lease predicate makes the named flush interleaving test fail Expected 0, Actual 1; restoration returns it green. The corrected SDD fixed point is current: fsgg-sdd analyze/verify/ship --dry-run each reported coherent true, noChange, no diagnostics, with implementationReady, verificationReady, and shipReady. The premature authorization is durably absent from the live PR body: body-edits records removal at 2026-08-25T07:08:21Z, live marker count is zero, and check-claim-generation against current head returns [missing]. Election 5406718363 alone authorizes no head; a later documented post-acceptance delivery call will intentionally reuse that append-only election as grounding but must create a new exact-head PR authorization marker, so no claim-generation rotation or election deletion is required. No semantic rename requires diff audit, and no unresolved material finding remains. This decision does not accept, merge, authorize, publish, or fulfill delivery."],"schema":"fsgg.coord.review-decision/v2","subject":"#2907/pr/2936","succession":null,"timestamp":"2026-08-25T07:28:28Z","verdict":"pass"}

[EHotwagner]

{"at":"2026-08-25T07:29:30.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"complete","evidenceRef":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406997564","reviewGeneration":"9f3149e286879a8da9fbff0671afdbf385c70f82:repair-confirmation:2","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[EHotwagner]

{"claimGeneration":"5406278215","enteredAt":"2026-08-25T07:57:31.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"enter","evidenceRef":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936","expiresAt":"2026-08-25T11:57:31.0000000\u002B00:00","item":"FS-GG/.github#2907","kind":"repair-confirmation","reviewGeneration":"d0b493569229dd749d3803c0670773932c80e192:repair-confirmation:3","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[EHotwagner]

Host critic-succession grant

The round-2 record passed at the prior head, then hosted validation exposed two production-fixture regressions that required a genuine implementation repair and a moved head. The SDD review contract requires a fresh independent critic for that repair-confirmation; this grant accounts for the identity change and is bound to the exact candidate head. It is not host acceptance, delivery authorization, or a repair-phase grant.

{
  "originalCriticIdentity": "snipe-8da1",
  "successorCriticIdentity": "teal-9f95",
  "grantedBy": "teal-682a",
  "reason": "round-2 pass followed by hosted write-harness regression repair requiring fresh independent confirmation",
  "candidateHeadSha": "d0b493569229dd749d3803c0670773932c80e192"
}

The successor must record its own fresh verdict against this exact head and bind this grant URL in the structured decision's succession object.

[EHotwagner]

{"acceptedExceptions":[],"baseSha":null,"claimGeneration":null,"critic":"teal-9f95","diffAuditReceipts":[],"diffAuditRequired":false,"digest":"bb4ca0ff2f7785092093103d3f074678712c0a6537007a818643fd2ee11597f0","headSha":"d0b493569229dd749d3803c0670773932c80e192","initialReview":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406502532","kind":"confirmation","policyVersion":"structured-decisions/1","precedingReview":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406997564","previousDigest":"e669cf93646719c47b6e448a644cf17ca1f63fc0da02ecc783fa48d0ef830059","repairPhaseReceipt":null,"revision":4,"round":3,"routeApplicability":"meaningful","routeEvidence":["Built artifact: exact-head Release fsgg-coord-engine at d0b4935; launcher SHA-256 f7dc79059479edcdaacaa79d6bcb0f96bef311a7f52331f51c29e8041e526153 and DLL SHA-256 c88e6184cf82c09664c8d4e2dd3f2228d0daaa79fd75ede7b912e135f4bb85a8. Verification: dotnet build src/FS.GG.Coord.Cli -c Release completed with 0 warnings and 0 errors in the detached exact-head review worktree; the durable exact-head BoardOps TRX reports total=259, executed=259, passed=259, failed=0.","Executed command: PATH=/tmp/fsgg-sdd-1.0.m625FK:$PATH tests/coord-engine-e2e/writes.sh exercised the production HTTP adapter with the explicitly vetted fsgg-sdd 1.0.0 validator and passed 186/186. The repaired #2134 intake leg observed issue POST, board-add GraphQL, lease POST, atomic dependency GraphQL, lease DELETE; the repaired #2157 reconcile leg observed lease POST, atomic Status-plus-Blocked-by GraphQL, lease DELETE, then durable lifecycle receipt POST. Verification: both named legs printed PASS and the final corpus summary was 186 passed, 0 failed.","Compared routes: restoring only tests/coord-engine-e2e/writes.sh from prior passed implementation head 9f3149e while retaining the exact d0b4935 production artifact made the vetted full corpus 184/186: only #2134 Blocked intake and #2157 lifecycle receipt/atomic batch were red on the new five-request and four-request lease traffic. Restoring the d0b4935 assertions returned 186/186. The exact-head parity production comparison independently passed 616/616 with 0 not measured, so the assertions discriminate the repaired wire ordering without regressing the broader command routes.","Observed result: PASS. Round 3\u0027s hosted failures are repaired: the exact order assertions preserve the semantic projectionFresh, projected-field, fresh-observation, coupled-write, and durable-receipt checks while adding the missing lease-wire boundary. fsgg-sdd 1.2.5 analyze, verify, and ship dry-runs each returned coherent=true, outcome=noChange, zero diagnostics, and respectively implementationReady, verificationReady, and shipReady; generated Claude/Codex command, skill, and normalized guidance projections are equivalent. Effective review base remains 712f025; current main b84f7db changes no path touched by this PR, and git merge-tree produced conflict-free tree 9a58941718b84b217ec4cbe271bbcd1ecae9cee0, so #2906 introduces no semantic overlap. Live PR head is exact and MERGEABLE, current obligations-none comment 5406348970 binds d0b4935, the PR body contains no fsgg:pr-authorization marker, and the structured ledger contains no acceptance record. The 47 hosted check-run census currently has 42 successes, one skip, two expected pre-authorization failures, and two still-running jobs; checks and host acceptance remain host-owned next gates. No semantic rename requires diff audit, and no unresolved material finding remains. This decision does not accept, merge, authorize, publish, or fulfill delivery."],"schema":"fsgg.coord.review-decision/v2","subject":"#2907/pr/2936","succession":{"grantUrl":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5407445734","grantedBy":"teal-682a","originalCritic":"snipe-8da1"},"timestamp":"2026-08-25T08:15:00Z","verdict":"pass"}

[EHotwagner]

{"at":"2026-08-25T08:14:40.0000000\u002B00:00","event":"complete","evidenceRef":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5407448928","reviewGeneration":"d0b493569229dd749d3803c0670773932c80e192:repair-confirmation:3","schema":"fsgg.coord.review-wait/v1"}

[EHotwagner]

{"acceptedExceptions":[],"baseSha":"b84f7db7e325a73e6d03b25103a2acf8a193c273","claimGeneration":"5406278215","critic":"teal-9f95","diffAuditReceipts":[],"diffAuditRequired":false,"digest":"2d9f57beeffd5ae34471c55b6aa60e6dc809c49aa24aae33d55d1666b883086d","headSha":"d0b493569229dd749d3803c0670773932c80e192","initialReview":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5406502532","kind":"acceptance","policyVersion":"structured-decisions/1","precedingReview":"https://github.com/FS-GG/.github/pull/2936#issuecomment-5407448928","previousDigest":"bb4ca0ff2f7785092093103d3f074678712c0a6537007a818643fd2ee11597f0","repairPhaseReceipt":null,"revision":5,"round":3,"routeApplicability":"meaningful","routeEvidence":["Built artifact: host acceptance binds the exact reviewed Release implementation head d0b4935 and the critic\u0027s independently built engine, BoardOps assembly, generated skill projections, and SDD readiness views at that head; no host rebuild is represented as critic evidence.","Executed command: the independent round-3 record ran the vetted production writes corpus at 186/186, parity at 616/616, BoardOps at 259/259, and SDD analyze/evidence/verify/ship to a coherent no-change fixed point; the host re-read all 47 settled GitHub checks and the live typed review ledger after wait completion.","Compared routes: the critic\u0027s dual lease-acquire inversion produced exactly 184/186 with only #2134 and #2157 red, restoration returned 186/186, equivalent Codex and Claude skill projections exposed all six required skills, and a synthetic merge against current main b84f7db was conflict-free with no semantic overlap from #2906.","Observed result: ACCEPTED. Fresh successor critic teal-9f95 passed with no unresolved material findings under exact-head host grant 5407445734. Hosted checks are settled with 42 successes, one skip, and only the expected pre-authorization claim-generation and claim-fence failures. The PR body has no authorization marker; this acceptance does not merge or authorize delivery."],"schema":"fsgg.coord.review-decision/v2","subject":"#2907/pr/2936","succession":null,"timestamp":"2026-08-25T08:16:13Z","verdict":"accepted"}