[No QA] Docs updates for E/A#98849 document bulk Download receipts in Search

[MelvinBot]

Docs updates for E/A#98849

This help-site PR documents the bulk Download receipts action in Search, which Expensify/App#98849 fixed. That PR gates Download receipts on receipt presence when reports/expenses are selected on the Spend > Reports and Spend > Expenses pages, and excludes deleted expenses from the export. The help site previously documented Download receipts only for the single-report More menu flow, so the bulk-selection behavior this PR changed was undocumented.

Changes

How-to-Export-Reports.md

• Added How to download the receipts on multiple reports (select reports on Spend > Reports → Selected → Download receipts), with a note that the option only appears when at least one selected report has an expense with a receipt.
• Updated the FAQ Why don't I see Download receipts on a report? to cover both the single-report More menu and the multi-report Selected flow.
• Updated keywords / internalScope to reflect bulk receipt download.

How-to-Export-Expenses.md

• Added How to download the receipts on selected expenses (select expenses on Spend > Expenses → Selected → Download receipts), with a note that the option only appears when at least one selected expense has a receipt and that deleted expenses are excluded.
• Added two FAQs: Why don't I see Download receipts for my selected expenses? and Are deleted expenses included when I download receipts?
• Updated description / keywords / internalScope to include receipt download.

Verification notes

• Label Download receipts and empty-state No receipts to download confirmed against src/languages/en.ts.
• Left-nav Spend section with Reports and Expenses tabs confirmed against the live web UI. The bulk-selection Selected button and menu could not be exercised live because the test account had no reports/expenses; the Selected wording matches the existing sibling sections in these same two articles and the PR's own test steps.

Fixed Issues

$ #98833
$ #98827

@truph01, please review the files changed and confirm they reflect the current behavior. Then post a new comment saying @MelvinBot mark this PR as ready for review.

[MelvinBot]

The only failing check on this PR is Check independent approval (run), and there's nothing to fix in the code.

That check isn't a build/test failure — it's a process gate that stays red until the PR receives an independent human review approval. It can't be resolved by a commit or a MelvinBot push; it clears once a reviewer approves.

Every actual CI check is green or still running:

• check, verify, verifySignedCommits, validate, spellcheck, dryRun, CLA → ✅ pass
• build → still pending (running, not failed)

Next step: this PR just needs a reviewer to approve it — no code change is required from me.

[OSBotify]

A preview of your ExpensifyHelp changes have been deployed to https://d63539c0.helpdot.pages.dev ⚡️

Updated articles:

• articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/How-to-Export-Expenses
• articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/How-to-Export-Reports

[truph01]

@MelvinBot mark this PR as ready

[truph01]

@MelvinBot mark this PR as ready

[MelvinBot]

✅ Marked this PR as ready for review.

---

view run

[MelvinBot]

✅ This PR is already marked as ready for review (out of draft).

---

view run

[github-actions]

HelpDot Documentation Review

Overall Assessment

This PR adds bulk receipt-download workflows to two existing export articles: a new "How to download the receipts on selected expenses" section (plus two FAQs) in How-to-Export-Expenses.md, and a new "How to download the receipts on multiple reports" section (plus a clarified FAQ) in How-to-Export-Reports.md. Metadata was updated in both files to reflect the expanded scope. The added content is high quality and closely follows the governance standards.

Scores Summary

• Readability: 9/10 - Steps are sequential, action-oriented, and scannable. Sentences are clear and concise, and the Note: callouts set expectations well.
• AI Readiness: 9/10 - New sections use task-based headings starting with How to / Why / Are. internalScope and keywords were updated to match the new workflows and real search phrasing (download receipts, receipt zip). Heading hierarchy stays within one top-level heading plus H2s.
• Style Compliance: 9/10 - UI labels are bolded and match the product exactly (Spend, Expenses, Reports, Selected, Download receipts, Download file). Navigation uses the approved unified web/mobile phrasing. The reworked Reports FAQ correctly distinguishes the single-report More menu path from the multi-select Selected path.

Key Findings

• Strong consistency: the new bulk receipt sections mirror the structure of the existing bulk-export/PDF sections, reinforcing the primary workflow rather than expanding scope.
• Metadata quality: internalScope accurately extends coverage (bulk receipt download) while preserving explicit exclusions and the cross-reference between the two articles.
• Minor: In How-to-Export-Expenses.md, the FAQ-style questions (including the two new ones) are H2 sections directly under the single title with no dedicated FAQ heading, unlike How-to-Export-Reports.md which uses a FAQ section. This is pre-existing structure, not introduced by this diff, but worth aligning across the two sibling articles.
• Minor: The two files bold the Spend breadcrumb arrow differently. Not a violation, but consider standardizing.

Recommendations

• (Optional) Standardize FAQ structure so both sibling articles use the same pattern.
• (Optional) Standardize the Spend > Reports / Spend > Expenses breadcrumb bolding across both files.
• No blocking issues; the added content is publish-ready against the governance criteria.

Files Reviewed

• docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/How-to-Export-Expenses.md - Added bulk receipt-download section + 2 FAQs; metadata updated. Compliant.
• docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/How-to-Export-Reports.md - Added multi-report receipt-download section; clarified receipts FAQ; metadata updated. Compliant.

Note: This is a top-level summary; the observations above apply to the added/modified lines only.

[melvin-bot]

Concierge reviewer checklist:

• I have verified the accuracy of the article
  • The article is within a hub that makes sense, and the navigation is correct
  • All processes, screenshots, and examples align with current product behavior.
  • All links within the doc have been verified for correct destination and functionality.
• I have verified the readability of the article
  • The article's language is clear, concise, and free of jargon.
  • The grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct.
  • The article contains at least one image, or that an image is not necessary
• I have verified the formatting of the article
  • The article has consistent formatting (headings, bullet points, etc.) with other HelpDot articles and that aligns with the HelpDot formatting standards.
  • The article has proper text spacing and breaks for readability.
• I have verified the article has the appropriate tone and style
  • The article's tone is professional, friendly, and suitable for the target audience.
  • The article's tone, terminology, and voice are consistent throughout.
• I have verified the overall quality of the article
  • The article is not missing any information, nor does it contain redundant information.
  • The article fully addresses user needs.
• I have verified that all requested improvements have been addressed

For more detailed instructions on completing this checklist, see How do I review a HelpDot PR as a Concierge Team member?

cc @RachCHopkins

[melvin-bot]

@truph01 @daledah @RachCHopkins One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[RachCHopkins]

LGTM

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/RachCHopkins in version: 9.4.64-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.4.64-3 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

• Android