Part 2 - Audit usage of Str.removeSMSDomain

[FitseTLT]

Explanation of Change

Six selection-list and pill components displayed user names and logins through Str.removeSMSDomain, which only strips the @expensify.sms suffix without formatting the number. A user whose login is a phone number and who has never set a display name therefore rendered as +15551234567 in these rows, while the same user appears correctly formatted everywhere that already uses formatPhoneNumber.

Each of those call sites now uses formatPhoneNumber from useLocalize(), so the value is reactive to the viewer's country code. Fields that hold a login (item.alternateText, item.login) are formatted directly, since formatPhoneNumber returns non-phone strings untouched. Fields that hold a display name (item.text, displayName) are guarded with Str.isSMSLogin first, because formatPhoneNumber replaces spaces with non-breaking spaces and would otherwise stop ordinary names from wrapping.

Fixed Issues

$ #97957
PROPOSAL: N/A — issue owner

Tests

Precondition: account A with a phone login (+1555…@expensify.sms) and no display name set. Log in as a second account that shares a workspace with it.

1. Open New chat and search for account A.
2. Verify the row's name reads (555) 123-4567 and not +15551234567 or +15551234567@expensify.sms.
3. Verify the login line beneath the name shows the same formatted number.
4. Open a workspace → Members → Invite member, and search for account A.
5. Verify the invite row shows the formatted number on both the name line and the login line.
6. Open an expense, add account A as an attendee, and verify the attendee pill shows the formatted number.
7. Hover the pill and verify the tooltip shows the formatted number too.
8. Add seven or more attendees including account A, so the list collapses to "+N more".
9. Hover/open the "+N more" affordance and verify account A appears formatted in the hidden-names list.
10. Open a workspace with Expensify Cards → assign a card → member selection step, and search for account A.
11. Verify the member row shows the formatted number.

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
  • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
  • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

2026-08-18.15-45-53.mp4

[melvin-bot]

@shubham1206agra Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ts/SelectionList/ListItem/InviteMemberListItem.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...nts/SelectionList/ListItem/UserListItemContent.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/UserPill.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/SelectionList/ListItem/UserSelectionListItem.tsx	90.47% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/UserPills.tsx	88.23% <50.00%> (-5.52%)	⬇️
...components/SelectionList/ListItem/CardListItem.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 091369606a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".