Skip to content

Add Don't change option to Reimbursable and Billable rule selectors - #98074

Open
MelvinBot wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude-rulesDontChangeOption
Open

Add Don't change option to Reimbursable and Billable rule selectors#98074
MelvinBot wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude-rulesDontChangeOption

Conversation

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Adds an explicit Don't change option to the Reimbursable and Billable selectors in Expense Rules, so the "leave this field unset" state is a real, discoverable choice instead of an undiscoverable "re-click the selected row to deselect" gesture.

All four surfaces (personal + workspace, Reimbursable + Billable) render through the shared RuleBooleanBase component, so the change is centralized:

  • The selector now renders three options — Don't change, Yes, No — and behaves like a true radio group that cannot be cleared to nothing. Don't change is selected by default when the field is unset, and picking it is how you unset the field (it calls onSelect(fieldID, null), the existing "no action" path). The old deselect-on-re-click branch is removed.
  • The Don't change sentinel is kept local to RuleBooleanBase (not added to CONST.SEARCH.BOOLEAN, which is shared with Search filters) so it does not leak into search.
  • The rule summary rows now show Don't change instead of a blank value when a field is unset — personal RulePageBase and workspace MerchantRulePageBase.
  • Adds the common.dontChange translation key to en.ts and all target locales.

Don't change maps to the field simply being absent from the saved rule, so there is no data-model, API, or backend change — this is purely a NewDot presentation change.

Note: only src/languages/en.ts is the source of truth for translations; the other locale files are auto-generated. The non-English strings in this PR were added by hand so type-checking passes, and the Polyglot Parrot workflow may propose refined translations — feel free to apply its patch.

Fixed Issues

$ #97746
PROPOSAL: #97746 (comment)

Tests

// TODO: The human co-author must fill out / confirm the tests before marking this PR as "ready for review".

Suggested steps:

  1. Go to Account > Expense rules and add / open a rule.
  2. Open the Reimbursable selector and verify it shows three options: Don't change, Yes, No.
  3. Verify Don't change is selected by default when the field has not been set.
  4. Verify the options behave like radio buttons that cannot be deselected: tapping the already-selected row does not clear it. Select Yes, reopen, then pick Don't change — the summary row should read Don't change (not blank).
  5. Repeat 2–4 for the Billable selector.
  6. Repeat 2–5 on the workspace path: Workspaces > [Workspace] > Rules > Add merchant rule.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests — this is a presentation-only change with no network dependency.

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]." Same as Tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Co-authored-by: Qichen Zhu <QichenZhu@users.noreply.github.com>
@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🦜 Polyglot Parrot! 🦜

Squawk! Looks like you added some shiny new English strings. Allow me to parrot them back to you in other tongues:

View the translation diff
diff --git a/src/languages/el.ts b/src/languages/el.ts
index 15e3ace519a..6ab8e4c4e19 100644
--- a/src/languages/el.ts
+++ b/src/languages/el.ts
@@ -321,7 +321,6 @@ const translations: TranslationDeepObject<typeof en> = {
         automatic: 'Αυτόματο',
         showing: 'Εμφανίζονται',
         of: 'του',
-        // @context Carousel pagination counter showing the current item's position out of the total (e.g. "3 of 50").
         currentOfTotal: ({current, total}: {current: number; total: number}) => `${current} από ${total}`,
         default: 'Προεπιλογή',
         update: 'Ενημέρωση',
@@ -7494,8 +7493,10 @@ _Για πιο αναλυτικές οδηγίες, [επισκεφθείτε τ
         },
         exportAgainModal: {
             title: 'Προσοχή!',
-            description: (reportName, connectionName) =>
-                `Οι παρακάτω αναφορές έχουν ήδη εξαχθεί στο ${CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME_USER_FRIENDLY[connectionName]}. Είστε βέβαιοι ότι θέλετε να τις εξαγάγετε ξανά;
+            description: (
+                reportName,
+                connectionName,
+            ) => `Οι παρακάτω αναφορές έχουν ήδη εξαχθεί στο ${CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME_USER_FRIENDLY[connectionName]}. Είστε βέβαιοι ότι θέλετε να τις εξαγάγετε ξανά;
 
 ${reportName}`,
             confirmText: 'Ναι, εξαγωγή ξανά',
diff --git a/src/languages/it.ts b/src/languages/it.ts
index fce61c689a0..4b6f46674ac 100644
--- a/src/languages/it.ts
+++ b/src/languages/it.ts
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ const translations: TranslationDeepObject<typeof en> = {
         unshare: 'Rimuovi condivisione',
         yes: 'Sì',
         no: 'No',
-        dontChange: 'Non modificare',
+        dontChange: 'Non cambiare',
         ok: 'OK',
         notNow: 'Non ora',
         noThanks: 'No, grazie',
diff --git a/src/languages/pt-BR.ts b/src/languages/pt-BR.ts
index f01a7d38347..508584eb0de 100644
--- a/src/languages/pt-BR.ts
+++ b/src/languages/pt-BR.ts
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ const translations: TranslationDeepObject<typeof en> = {
         unshare: 'Deixar de compartilhar',
         yes: 'Sim',
         no: 'Não',
-        dontChange: 'Não alterar',
+        dontChange: 'Não altere',
         ok: 'OK',
         notNow: 'Agora não',
         noThanks: 'Não, obrigado',
diff --git a/src/languages/zh-hans.ts b/src/languages/zh-hans.ts
index 82b536c4b02..e8028455686 100644
--- a/src/languages/zh-hans.ts
+++ b/src/languages/zh-hans.ts
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ const translations: TranslationDeepObject<typeof en> = {
         unshare: '取消共享',
         yes: '是',
         no: '否',
-        dontChange: '不更改',
+        dontChange: '不要更改',
         ok: 'OK',
         notNow: '暂不处理',
         noThanks: '不用了,谢谢',

Note

You can apply these changes to your branch by copying the patch to your clipboard, then running pbpaste | git apply 😉

View workflow run

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...space/rules/MerchantRules/MerchantRulePageBase.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/settings/Rules/RulePageBase.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/Rule/RuleBooleanBase.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I looked into the failing checks — there's nothing to fix in the code. The two failing checks both require human action, not a code change:

  • PR Author Checklist / checklist — fails because the PR Author Checklist boxes aren't checked and the Tests / QA Steps sections still contain the // TODO placeholders. These are human-only sections, so I can't fill them out or check the boxes on your behalf. Once you (as the human co-author) complete the checklist and testing steps and check the boxes, this check will pass.
  • Check independent approval — this just needs a reviewer's approval; it isn't something a code push can resolve.

Everything else is green: typecheck, all test jobs, baseline-perf-tests / branch-perf-tests, ESLint, Storybook tests, Bun tests, Oxfmt, React Compiler Compliance, and the build jobs all pass.

So no fix was pushed — the remaining red checks resolve once the author checklist is completed and a reviewer approves.

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I re-checked — the status is unchanged from my previous comment, and there's still no code failure to push a fix for. The only two red checks are both human/reviewer-gated:

  • PR Author Checklist / checklist — waiting on the human co-author to complete the Tests / QA Steps sections (they still have // TODO placeholders) and check the author checklist boxes. I can't fill out those human-only sections on your behalf.
  • Check independent approval — waiting on a reviewer's approval.

All code/test checks pass: typecheck, every test job, both perf test suites, ESLint, Storybook tests, Bun tests, Oxfmt, React Compiler Compliance, and the build jobs. These two will clear once the author checklist is completed and a reviewer approves.

@QichenZhu

QichenZhu commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
    https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1783323431995659
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen_recording_20260810_165118.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen_recording_20260810_165647.webm
iOS: HybridApp
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.17.-.2026-08-10.at.14.57.23.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.16e.-.2026-08-10.at.16.51.06.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-08-13.at.9.45.18.PM.mov

@QichenZhu

QichenZhu commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Author checklist

Tests

  1. Go to Account > Expense rules and add / open a rule.
  2. Open the Reimbursable selector and verify it shows three options: Don't change, Yes, No.
  3. Verify Don't change is selected by default when the field has not been set.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests.

QA Steps

Same as Tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
    https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1783323431995659
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen_recording_20260810_165118.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen_recording_20260810_165647.webm
iOS: HybridApp
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.17.-.2026-08-10.at.14.57.23.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.16e.-.2026-08-10.at.16.51.06.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-08-10.at.2.54.15.PM.mov

@QichenZhu QichenZhu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from MariaHCD August 10, 2026 05:12
@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The two failing checks aren't code problems — they both need a human, and there's nothing for me to push.

  • PR Author Checklist / checklist — fails with PR Author Checklist is not completely filled out. Please check every box…. The author checkboxes are still unchecked and the Tests / QA Steps sections still contain the // TODO: placeholders. A human co-author needs to fill out the test steps and tick the checklist boxes (the PR body already notes this is required before marking it ready for review).
  • Check independent approval — needs an independent reviewer to approve the PR.

The actual CI (typecheck, ESLint, Bun/unit tests, builds, Storybook, perf, etc.) is all green, so no code fix is needed from me here.

@QichenZhu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot, please resolve conflicts. Thanks!

…eOption

Co-authored-by: Qichen Zhu <QichenZhu@users.noreply.github.com>

# Conflicts:
#	src/components/Rule/RuleBooleanBase.tsx
@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Resolved the conflicts and pushed the merge of main — the PR is mergeable again.

The only real conflict was in src/components/Rule/RuleBooleanBase.tsx:61-67. main had added a formValue !== '' guard to the "is the field set?" check, while this PR changed the default selection to the local KEEP_UNCHANGED sentinel. I kept both: selectedItem still defaults to KEEP_UNCHANGED (Don't change), and the guard now treats an empty string as unset too.

let selectedItem: ValueOf<typeof CONST.SEARCH.BOOLEAN> | typeof KEEP_UNCHANGED = KEEP_UNCHANGED;
if (formValue !== undefined && formValue !== '') {

The language files auto-merged cleanly. npm run typecheck-tsgo passes. Please re-run through the test steps since main was merged in.

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 I re-checked all checks on this PR. There's no code fix to push — every automated code/CI check is now passing (typecheck, all test jobs, baseline/branch perf tests, ESLint, Storybook, Bun tests, spellcheck, etc.).

The only two failing checks are non-code process gates that require human action, not a code change:

  • PR Author Checklist / checklist — failing because 0 of 38 checklist boxes are ticked. This is expected: I opened this PR as a draft, so the human co-author needs to fill out the ### PR Author Checklist, Tests, and QA Steps sections and check the boxes. It passes automatically once the checklist is complete.
  • Check independent approval — failing because the PR hasn't received an independent review approval yet. It resolves once a reviewer approves.

Neither is fixable by pushing to the branch, so I've left the code untouched. Once the checklist is completed and a review approval lands, both will clear.

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Re-checked — the state is unchanged from my previous comment. All automated code/CI checks are passing on the current commit (3c9a7f0). The only two failing checks are non-code process gates that I can't fix by pushing:

  • PR Author Checklist / checklist — needs the human co-author to fill out the checklist / Tests / QA sections and tick the boxes.
  • Check independent approval — needs an independent reviewer to approve.

There's nothing for me to push here; both clear once those human steps are done.

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Re-checked — nothing has changed since my earlier analysis. All 42 automated code/CI checks pass. The only two failing checks are non-code process gates that can't be fixed by a code push:

  • PR Author Checklist / checklist — needs the human co-author to fill out the ### PR Author Checklist / Tests / QA Steps sections and tick the boxes.
  • Check independent approval — needs an independent reviewer to approve.

There's no code fix for me to make here, so I've left the branch untouched. Both clear once the checklist is completed and a review approval lands.

@MariaHCD
MariaHCD marked this pull request as ready for review August 17, 2026 15:24
@MariaHCD
MariaHCD requested a review from a team as a code owner August 17, 2026 15:24
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from QichenZhu and flaviadefaria and removed request for a team August 17, 2026 15:24
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@QichenZhu Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@QichenZhu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot please merge main again. Thanks.

…eOption

Co-authored-by: Qichen Zhu <QichenZhu@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot
MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 17, 2026 23:49
@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Merged main into this branch — no conflicts, and it's pushed. The branch was 1 commit behind; the merge commit is fcd14d3bb4d.

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from robertjchen and removed request for a team August 17, 2026 23:50
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@robertjchen Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There's no code-level check failure to fix — every substantive check on this PR is now green (typecheck, all 8 test jobs, ESLint, Oxfmt, Bun tests, Storybook, generateTranslations, and both branch/baseline perf tests all passed).

The only check reporting fail is Check independent approval, which is not a CI/code failure. It's a process gate that stays red until an independent reviewer approves the PR — it can't be resolved with a commit. Once this PR gets an approving review, that check will clear on its own.

So no fix was pushed, because there isn't a broken check to fix. Let me know if you were seeing a different failure and I'll take another look.

@QichenZhu QichenZhu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Retested, still looks good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants