[No QA] Docs updates for E/A#96012 Public receipt visibility toggle in Rules

[MelvinBot]

Explanation of Change

#96012 ports the Public receipt visibility toggle from Expensify Classic to New Expensify. It adds a toggle to the Expenses section of a Control workspace's Rules tab that controls whether receipt images are viewable by anyone with the URL or only by Expensify members with report access.

This PR documents that new setting in the NewDot Workspace Rules help article:

• Added a Public receipt visibility bullet to the Expense Rule options list.
• Added an FAQ entry explaining who can view receipts when the setting is enabled.
• Added related keywords for retrieval.

All labels and subtitle copy were verified against the live NewDot UI (Control workspace → Rules → Expenses section):

• Label: Public receipt visibility
• Off (default) subtitle: Receipts are only viewable by Expensify members with access to the report containing the receipt.
• On subtitle: Receipts are viewable by anyone with the URL. Access to the report with the receipt is not required.

Related PR

• Source PR: Add Public receipt visibility toggle to Rules for Control workspaces #96012
• Source issue: [CFI] [Rules Revamp] [Hold E/App #92742] Add Public Receipt Visibility toggle to Rules #93214

---

@Krishna2323, please review the files changed and confirm they reflect the current behavior. Then post a new comment saying @MelvinBot mark this PR as ready for review.

[OSBotify]

A preview of your ExpensifyHelp changes have been deployed to https://dd62a5fa.helpdot.pages.dev ⚡️

Updated articles:

• articles/new-expensify/workspaces/Workspace-Rules

[github-actions]

HelpDot Documentation Review

Overall Assessment

This PR makes a small, well-scoped documentation update to Workspace-Rules.md, porting the new Public receipt visibility toggle into the NewDot Workspace Rules article. The changes add a keyword set, a bullet under the Expense Rule options list, and a matching FAQ entry. The additions are consistent with the surrounding article and align closely with the governance standards.

Scores Summary

• Readability: 9/10 - The new bullet and FAQ answer are clear, concise, and explain both the enabled and default (disabled) behavior. Sentences flow well and are easy to scan.
• AI Readiness: 9/10 - The FAQ heading is a full, task-based question ("Who can view receipts when Public receipt visibility is enabled?") using the exact feature name. Added keywords (public receipt visibility, share receipt link, receipt URL) reflect realistic search intent. internalScope is present and still accurate. Only # and ## headings are used.
• Style Compliance: 9/10 - The toggle label Public receipt visibility is bolded and matches the UI exactly per the Toggles rule. No prohibited or vague navigation language introduced. FAQ structure follows conventions.

Key Findings

• The FAQ heading is correctly phrased with a question word ("Who...") and includes the exact feature name, satisfying the task-based heading rules.
• The toggle label is bolded and matches the live UI label verified in the PR description, complying with the Section and Toggle References rule.
• Both the on and off (default) states are documented in the bullet and the FAQ, which is excellent for reducing member confusion.
• Minor redundancy: the new bullet and the FAQ answer restate nearly identical explanations of the enabled/disabled behavior. This is acceptable for retrieval but slightly duplicative.

Recommendations

• No blocking issues. The changes are compliant and ready.
• Optional: tighten the wording so the bullet and FAQ do not repeat the same two sentences verbatim, or let the FAQ add incremental detail (the client/external accountant use case, which it already does well).

Files Reviewed

• docs/articles/new-expensify/workspaces/Workspace-Rules.md - Compliant. Adds a bolded toggle bullet, a task-based FAQ entry, and relevant keywords. No governance violations found.

Note: Detailed line-by-line feedback has been provided as inline comments.

[melvin-bot]

Concierge reviewer checklist:

• I have verified the accuracy of the article
  • The article is within a hub that makes sense, and the navigation is correct
  • All processes, screenshots, and examples align with current product behavior.
  • All links within the doc have been verified for correct destination and functionality.
• I have verified the readability of the article
  • The article's language is clear, concise, and free of jargon.
  • The grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct.
  • The article contains at least one image, or that an image is not necessary
• I have verified the formatting of the article
  • The article has consistent formatting (headings, bullet points, etc.) with other HelpDot articles and that aligns with the HelpDot formatting standards.
  • The article has proper text spacing and breaks for readability.
• I have verified the article has the appropriate tone and style
  • The article's tone is professional, friendly, and suitable for the target audience.
  • The article's tone, terminology, and voice are consistent throughout.
• I have verified the overall quality of the article
  • The article is not missing any information, nor does it contain redundant information.
  • The article fully addresses user needs.
• I have verified that all requested improvements have been addressed

For more detailed instructions on completing this checklist, see How do I review a HelpDot PR as a Concierge Team member?

cc @kadiealexander

[melvin-bot]

@kadiealexander Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]