Skip to content

Replace getDisplayNameOrDefault with temporaryGetDisplayNameOrDefault - batch 16 - #97364

Closed
cretadn22 wants to merge 3 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
cretadn22:migrate-temporaryGetDisplayNameOrDefault-batch-16
Closed

Replace getDisplayNameOrDefault with temporaryGetDisplayNameOrDefault - batch 16#97364
cretadn22 wants to merge 3 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
cretadn22:migrate-temporaryGetDisplayNameOrDefault-batch-16

Conversation

@cretadn22

@cretadn22 cretadn22 commented Jul 29, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #66392
PROPOSAL: #66392

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Go to Spend > Reports
  2. Select a submitted report
  3. Click the dropdown menu and select Change approver
  4. Click Add approver
  5. Select a new approver
  6. Open the expense report and verify that the next step message displays the correct approver name
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-07-30.at.01.51.01.mov

@cretadn22
cretadn22 requested review from a team as code owners July 29, 2026 18:03
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from heyjennahay and shubham1206agra and removed request for a team July 29, 2026 18:03
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shubham1206agra Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team July 29, 2026 18:03
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 29, 2026 •
edited by github-actions Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/libs/ReportUtils.ts 86.91% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/actions/Task.ts 64.36% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/ReportAddApproverPage.tsx 84.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/Search/SearchAddApproverPage.tsx 76.47% <ø> (ø)
...c/pages/tasks/DynamicTaskAssigneeSelectorModal.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/actions/IOU/ReportWorkflow.ts 81.88% <50.00%> (ø)
src/pages/DynamicReportChangeApproverPage.tsx 1.69% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/Search/SearchChangeApproverPage.tsx 6.73% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

@cretadn22

cretadn22 commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra The PR is ready

@cretadn22
Merge branch 'main' into migrate-temporaryGetDisplayNameOrDefault-bat…
886944a 
…ch-16

# Conflicts:
#	src/libs/ReportUtils.ts
#	src/libs/actions/IOU/ReportWorkflow.ts
#	src/libs/actions/Task.ts
#	src/pages/DynamicReportChangeApproverPage.tsx
#	src/pages/ReportAddApproverPage.tsx
#	src/pages/Search/SearchAddApproverPage.tsx
#	src/pages/Search/SearchChangeApproverPage.tsx
#	src/pages/tasks/DynamicTaskAssigneeSelectorModal.tsx
#	tests/actions/TaskTest.ts
@cretadn22

cretadn22 commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Friendly bump @shubham1206agra, could you please review this PR?

@shubham1206agra

shubham1206agra commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please hold this PR on #97995

@shubham1206agra

shubham1206agra commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cretadn22 Merge main please

@cretadn22

cretadn22 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra Resolved

@shubham1206agra

shubham1206agra commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Screen.Recording.2026-08-12.at.6.08.47.PM.mov

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from mountiny August 12, 2026 12:39
shubham1206agra
shubham1206agra suggested changes Aug 12, 2026
View reviewed changes

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not merge. I approved by mistake.

shubham1206agra
shubham1206agra reviewed Aug 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread src/libs/ReportUtils.ts
managerID: number,
actorAccountID: number,
formatPhoneNumber: LocaleContextProps['formatPhoneNumber'],
translate: LocalizedTranslate,

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cretadn22 Please don't pass translate function in report action generation functions. As they are in plain English.

@mountiny

mountiny commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cretadn22 can you please complete this pr? thanks

@cretadn22

cretadn22 commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I will create this PR once PR #97369 has been merged

@cretadn22 cretadn22 closed this Aug 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@heyjennahay heyjennahay Awaiting requested review from heyjennahay
@mountiny mountiny Awaiting requested review from mountiny
1 more reviewer
@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra shubham1206agra requested changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@cretadn22 cretadn22

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cretadn22 @shubham1206agra @mountiny