Skip to content

Remove Onyx.connect() for the key: ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT in src/libs/ReportUtils.ts (part 6) - #93423

Open
truph01 wants to merge 27 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
truph01:fix/66416-part-6
Open

Remove Onyx.connect() for the key: ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT in src/libs/ReportUtils.ts (part 6)#93423
truph01 wants to merge 27 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
truph01:fix/66416-part-6

Conversation

@truph01

@truph01 truph01 commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

  • This PR is the 6th step to remove Onyx.connect() for the key: ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT in src/libs/ReportUtils.ts.
    This PR focus on refactoring the places where getPolicyExpenseChat are called directly in component and hook

Fixed Issues

$ #66416
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Open ND app
  2. Open Policy expense chat > Request 2 expenses
  3. Open report in step 2
  4. Open any expense > Click "More" dropdown button > Choose "Duplicate expense"
  5. Verify the new expense is added to the report in step 2
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Open ND app
  2. Open Policy expense chat > Request 2 expenses
  3. Open report in step 2
  4. Open any expense > Click "More" dropdown button > Choose "Duplicate expense"
  5. Verify the new expense is added to the report in step 2
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained ""why"" the code was doing something instead of only explaining ""what"" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named ""index.js"". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-06-12.at.19.12.43.mov

@truph01
truph01 requested review from a team as code owners June 12, 2026 11:55
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from DylanDylann and removed request for a team June 12, 2026 11:56
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DylanDylann Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from trjExpensify and removed request for a team June 12, 2026 11:56
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/hooks/useBulkDuplicateAction.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useBulkDuplicateReportAction.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useDefaultParticipants.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useExpenseActions.ts 66.03% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useSearchBulkActions.ts 71.11% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
src/hooks/useSelectedTransactionsActions.ts 78.21% <100.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
src/selectors/Report.ts 79.26% <100.00%> (+0.51%) ⬆️
.../components/MoneyRequestHeaderSecondaryActions.tsx 0.49% <0.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useReceiptScanDrop.tsx 46.34% <50.00%> (+1.34%) ⬆️
... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

getTransactionThreadPrimaryAction(currentUserLogin ?? '', accountID, report, parentReport, transaction, transactionViolations, policy, false)
);
const activePolicyExpenseChat = getPolicyExpenseChat(accountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id);
const [allReports] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-11 (docs)

Adding useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT) without a selector subscribes to the entire reports collection, which is very large and changes frequently. This will cause the component to re-render on every single report change across the app, even though only one specific policy expense chat report is needed.

Consider using a selector that finds the policy expense chat inline, returning only the needed report (or undefined). For example:

const [activePolicyExpenseChat] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT, {
    selector: (reports) =>
        Object.values(reports ?? {}).find(
            (report) =>
                report?.policyID === defaultExpensePolicy?.id &&
                isPolicyExpenseChat(report) &&
                !isThread(report) &&
                report?.ownerAccountID === accountID,
        ) ?? null,
});

Since the selector output is a single report object (small), deepEqual will be cheap and will prevent re-renders when unrelated reports change.


Reviewed at: 3d333dd | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved this concern

Comment thread src/hooks/useDefaultParticipants.ts Outdated
const [amountOwed] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.NVP_PRIVATE_AMOUNT_OWED);
const [userBillingGracePeriodEnds] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.SHARED_NVP_PRIVATE_USER_BILLING_GRACE_PERIOD_END);
const [ownerBillingGracePeriodEnd] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.NVP_PRIVATE_OWNER_BILLING_GRACE_PERIOD_END);
const [allReports] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-11 (docs)

Adding useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT) without a selector subscribes to the entire reports collection. Since allReports is also added to the useMemo dependency array (line 89), the memoized computation will be invalidated on every report change across the app, defeating the purpose of useMemo.

Consider using a selector that directly computes the policy expense chat report, or extract the getPolicyExpenseChat logic into a selector so only the specific report is returned. This avoids both the unnecessary re-renders and the useMemo invalidation:

const [activePolicyExpenseChat] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT, {
    selector: (reports) =>
        Object.values(reports ?? {}).find(
            (report) =>
                report?.policyID === defaultExpensePolicy?.id &&
                isPolicyExpenseChat(report) &&
                !isThread(report) &&
                report?.ownerAccountID === accountID,
        ) ?? null,
});

Then use activePolicyExpenseChat directly in the useMemo instead of allReports.


Reviewed at: 3d333dd | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved this concern


// Global collections
const [personalDetails] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST);
const [allTransactions] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TRANSACTION);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-11 (docs)

Adding useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT) without a selector subscribes to the entire reports collection. The result is used only to call getPolicyExpenseChat, which searches for a single matching report. Every change to any report in the app will cause this hook (and its consumers) to re-render.

Consider using a selector to find the policy expense chat directly, returning only the single needed report:

const [activePolicyExpenseChat] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT, {
    selector: (reports) =>
        Object.values(reports ?? {}).find(
            (report) =>
                report?.policyID === defaultExpensePolicy?.id &&
                isPolicyExpenseChat(report) &&
                !isThread(report) &&
                report?.ownerAccountID === accountID,
        ) ?? null,
});

Reviewed at: 3d333dd | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved this concern

Comment thread src/hooks/useReceiptScanDrop.tsx Outdated
const [personalPolicyID] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_POLICY_ID);
const [personalPolicy] = useOnyx(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.POLICY}${personalPolicyID}`);
const [draftTransactionIDs] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TRANSACTION_DRAFT, {selector: validTransactionDraftIDsSelector});
const [allReports] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-11 (docs)

Adding useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT) without a selector subscribes to the entire reports collection. This value is only used inside the saveFileAndInitMoneyRequest callback (not in the render path), so every report change will trigger a re-render of this hook and all its consumers unnecessarily.

Consider using a selector to find the specific policy expense chat directly:

const [policyExpenseChat] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT, {
    selector: (reports) =>
        Object.values(reports ?? {}).find(
            (report) =>
                report?.policyID === activePolicy?.id &&
                isPolicyExpenseChat(report) &&
                !isThread(report) &&
                report?.ownerAccountID === currentUserPersonalDetails.accountID,
        ) ?? null,
});

This returns a single small report object, so deepEqual is cheap and re-renders only happen when the specific policy expense chat changes.


Reviewed at: 3d333dd | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved this concern

Comment thread src/hooks/useSearchBulkActions.ts Outdated
const activePolicyExpenseChat = useMemo(
() => getPolicyExpenseChat(currentUserPersonalDetails.accountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id),
[currentUserPersonalDetails.accountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id],
() => getPolicyExpenseChat(currentUserPersonalDetails.accountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id, allReports),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-11 (docs)

Adding allReports to the useMemo dependency array means this memoized value will be recomputed on every report change across the app, since the existing useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT) subscription has no selector. The getPolicyExpenseChat function only needs to find a single matching report.

Consider replacing the allReports-based useMemo with a direct useOnyx call using a selector:

const [activePolicyExpenseChat] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT, {
    selector: (reports) =>
        Object.values(reports ?? {}).find(
            (report) =>
                report?.policyID === defaultExpensePolicy?.id &&
                isPolicyExpenseChat(report) &&
                !isThread(report) &&
                report?.ownerAccountID === currentUserPersonalDetails.accountID,
        ) ?? null,
});

This avoids recomputing on every report change and only updates when the specific policy expense chat changes.


Reviewed at: 3d333dd | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved this concern

}, [selectedTransactionIDs, allTransactions]);

const activePolicyExpenseChat = useMemo(() => getPolicyExpenseChat(currentUserAccountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id), [currentUserAccountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id]);
const activePolicyExpenseChat = useMemo(() => getPolicyExpenseChat(currentUserAccountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id, allReports), [currentUserAccountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id, allReports]);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-11 (docs)

Adding allReports to the useMemo dependency array means this memoized value will be recomputed on every report change across the app, since the existing useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT) subscription has no selector. The getPolicyExpenseChat function only needs to find a single matching report.

Consider replacing the allReports-based useMemo with a direct useOnyx call using a selector:

const [activePolicyExpenseChat] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT, {
    selector: (reports) =>
        Object.values(reports ?? {}).find(
            (report) =>
                report?.policyID === defaultExpensePolicy?.id &&
                isPolicyExpenseChat(report) &&
                !isThread(report) &&
                report?.ownerAccountID === currentUserAccountID,
        ) ?? null,
});

This avoids recomputing on every report change and only updates when the specific policy expense chat changes.


Reviewed at: 3d333dd | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved this concern

@trjExpensify
trjExpensify removed their request for review June 12, 2026 16:38
@trjExpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR doesn’t need product input as a refactor PR. Unassigning and unsubscribing myself.

@truph01

truph01 commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: ab635185c4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@truph01

truph01 commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@DylanDylann Could you review this PR? It is a separate flow, which isn't related to previous part.

@truph01

truph01 commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bb368bb407

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/selectors/Report.ts Outdated
@DylanDylann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Let me know when this is ready

@truph01

truph01 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@DylanDylann It is ready

@DylanDylann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex review

() => policyExpenseChatSelector(currentUserPersonalDetails.accountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id),
[currentUserPersonalDetails.accountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id],
);
const [activePolicyExpenseChat] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT, {selector: activePolicyExpenseChatSelector});

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use policyExpenseChatSelector directly without activePolicyExpenseChatSelector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These hooks don't compile with React Compiler, so there's no auto-memoization — inline would recreate the selector every render. Keeping the useMemo wrapper. Inline is fine in the other call sites because those files do compile.


const activePolicyExpenseChat = useMemo(() => getPolicyExpenseChat(currentUserAccountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id), [currentUserAccountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id]);
const activePolicyExpenseChatSelector = useMemo(() => policyExpenseChatSelector(currentUserAccountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id), [currentUserAccountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id]);
const [activePolicyExpenseChat] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT, {selector: activePolicyExpenseChatSelector});

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same above

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These hooks don't compile with React Compiler, so there's no auto-memoization — inline would recreate the selector every render. Keeping the useMemo wrapper. Inline is fine in the other call sites because those files do compile.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: 728a15f9f5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@DylanDylann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Screen.Recording.2026-08-18.at.17.18.52.mov

@DylanDylann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@truph01 left some NITs. Love your idea 🚀

@truph01

truph01 commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@DylanDylann I resolved all your comments

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from Gonals August 19, 2026 09:12
@DylanDylann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5b9169247b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

const [, policyCollectionResult] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.POLICY, {selector: () => null});

const accountID = currentUserPersonalDetails.accountID;
const [activePolicyExpenseChat] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT, {selector: policyExpenseChatSelector(accountID, defaultExpensePolicy?.id)});

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Track the report collection while resolving participants

When the report collection is still hydrating after the other tracked Onyx values have loaded, this selector temporarily returns undefined, but isLoading becomes false because the new subscription's metadata is ignored. In the global-create confirmation flow, that empty result is interpreted as having no default participant and can auto-open the participant picker before the default workspace chat arrives; selecting someone during that window prevents the intended workspace auto-assignment. Capture this call's result metadata and include it in isLoadingOnyxValue(...), as is already done for the self-DM lookup.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants