Remove assert for empty workers

[Opt-Mucca]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.16%. Comparing base (8e8d4f6) to head (422df29).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on latest.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           latest    #3134      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.16%   73.16%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         430      430              
  Lines      103967   103965       -2     
  Branches    16718    16717       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        76069    76065       -4     
- Misses      27622    27624       +2     
  Partials      276      276              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[odow]

I don’t have the ability to review this. As a high level comment: tests, or it didn’t happen. I would love to better understand how we can more robustly test highs, instead of running a few large scale instances and declaring success.

[jajhall]

I don’t have the ability to review this. As a high level comment: tests, or it didn’t happen. I would love to better understand how we can more robustly test highs, instead of running a few large scale instances and declaring success.

Although the need to test HiGHS more thoroughly on LPs, and to test presolve rules on curated special cases has been exposed in recent weeks - and is being addressed, the testing of HiGHS has always been rather more than "running a few large scale instances and declaring success." @fwesselm is performing regression testing on about 850 MIPs.