Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

4 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Python Transformers Research

Dialogue Summarization Context Ablation Study

Associated Publication

The Perils of Naive Truncation: A Context Ablation Study for Dialogue Summarization on DialogSum

Abstract

Dialogue summarization systems often employ context truncation strategies to reduce computational costs. While truncation improves efficiency, its impact on summary quality and semantic fidelity remains insufficiently explored.

This study investigates the effects of naive context truncation on dialogue summarization performance using the DialogSum benchmark dataset. Through a systematic context ablation analysis, we compare full-dialogue summarization against truncated dialogue variants and evaluate performance using ROUGE and BERTScore metrics.

Our findings demonstrate that naive truncation leads to consistent degradation in summary quality, particularly for longer conversations where critical contextual information is distributed across multiple dialogue turns. The results highlight the importance of preserving conversational context and suggest that efficiency gains from aggressive truncation may come at the expense of factual completeness and semantic accuracy.


Research Objectives

  • Evaluate the impact of dialogue context on summarization quality.
  • Compare full-dialogue and truncated-dialogue inputs.
  • Quantify performance degradation using ROUGE and BERTScore.
  • Analyze effects across short and long conversations.
  • Provide empirical evidence regarding context preservation in dialogue summarization.

Dataset

DialogSum

A large-scale dialogue summarization dataset consisting of multi-turn conversations paired with human-written summaries.


Models Evaluated

  • DistilBART
  • BART
  • T5

Primary lightweight model:

text sshleifer/distilbart-cnn-12-6


Experimental Design

Full Context

Model receives the entire dialogue.

Context Ablation

Model receives only the most recent K dialogue turns:

text K ∈ {0, 1, 2, 4, 6}

Performance is compared against the full-context baseline.


Evaluation Metrics

ROUGE

  • ROUGE-1
  • ROUGE-2
  • ROUGE-L

BERTScore

Measures semantic similarity between generated and reference summaries.


Key Findings

  • Full dialogue context consistently outperforms truncated inputs.
  • Performance degradation increases with aggressive truncation.
  • Long conversations are significantly more affected than short conversations.
  • BERTScore and ROUGE metrics both indicate loss of semantic information under naive truncation.
  • Efficiency gains are relatively small compared to quality degradation.

Technologies Used

  • Python
  • PyTorch
  • Hugging Face Transformers
  • DialogSum Dataset
  • ROUGE
  • BERTScore
  • Google Colab

Citation

If you use this work, please cite:

Kolla, D. V. The Perils of Naive Truncation: A Context Ablation Study for Dialogue Summarization on DialogSum.


Author

Devasish Viswanadh Kolla

B.Tech Computer Science and Engineering
SRM University AP

Research Areas:

  • Natural Language Processing
  • Generative AI
  • Dialogue Systems
  • Explainable AI
  • Trustworthy AI

About

Context ablation study for dialogue summarization on DialogSum, analyzing the impact of naive truncation using ROUGE and BERTScore.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages