Skip to content

feat(postgres): enforce distributed rate buckets - #19

Merged
Deathcharge merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/postgres-rate-limits-v0.13
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

feat(postgres): enforce distributed rate buckets#19
Deathcharge merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/postgres-rate-limits-v0.13

Conversation

@Deathcharge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • advance the internal PostgreSQL foundation to schema v5 with message, search, and typing rate buckets
  • atomically enforce a fixed database-time allowance per scope/identity across replicas while keeping hot identities on row-level contention
  • bound new-key cardinality under a dedicated advisory lock, prune expired buckets, and fail closed at capacity
  • persist only scope-separated SHA-256 key digests and explicitly document that hashing is data minimization rather than anonymization

Verification

  • python -m ruff check .
  • python -m ruff format --check .
  • python -m mypy samsarix_chat_engine/postgres.py samsarix_chat_engine/postgres_rate_limits.py
  • python -m pytest -q -m "not postgres" → 139 passed
  • live PostgreSQL concurrent exact-limit, independent-scope, privacy-shape, capacity, and expiry tests run in CI

Migration and rollback

Opening the internal foundation adds samsarix_rate_buckets and advances compatible schema metadata to v5; authoritative room/message data is unchanged. The backend remains unavailable through public configuration. Pre-wiring rollback requires stopping candidate processes, dropping the v5-only table, restoring metadata to v4, and deploying the prior exact commit.

Remaining gates

Presence/typing expiry, public request-path wiring, real multi-process tests, retained-log gaps, interruption, load/soak, reconnect storms, backup, and rollback drills remain required before any horizontal-scale claim. Fixed-window boundary behavior is deliberate and documented; load evidence must validate it.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Deathcharge, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 16 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c51e763b-954b-4732-a133-9b9464bea5be

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c688005 and 8222e5a.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • ROADMAP.md
  • docs/MULTI_INSTANCE_ARCHITECTURE.md
  • samsarix_chat_engine/postgres.py
  • samsarix_chat_engine/postgres_rate_limits.py
  • tests/conftest.py
  • tests/test_postgres_rate_limits.py
  • tests/test_postgres_store.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Deathcharge
Deathcharge marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2026 12:14
@Deathcharge
Deathcharge merged commit b150c3e into main Aug 2, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant