Fix Go linter for SGC on AIX#53264
Conversation
|
🎯 Code Coverage (details) 🔗 Commit SHA: 824bd17 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback! |
Files inventory check summaryFile checks results against ancestor daecc708: Results for datadog-agent_7.82.0~devel.git.686.824bd17.pipeline.123220453-1_amd64.deb:No change detected |
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates 32 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 4cfa637 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +1.65 | [+0.57, +2.74] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | +0.70 | [+0.45, +0.95] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.46 | [+0.42, +0.49] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load | memory utilization | +0.31 | [+0.27, +0.35] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.13 | [+0.08, +0.18] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_security_idle | memory utilization | -0.23 | [-0.29, -0.17] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_security_no_fs_load | memory utilization | -0.31 | [-0.41, -0.21] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | observed_value | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 4 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | 148.30MiB ≤ 154MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 577.68KiB ≤ 819.20KiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 4 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | 486.00MiB ≤ 495MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 0.89MiB ≤ 1.25MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 180.64MiB ≤ 195MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 264.18MiB ≤ 292MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 340.87 ≤ 2000 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 396.50MiB ≤ 430MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 0.86GiB ≤ 1.04GiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_idle | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 28.56 ≤ 40 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | 296.83MiB ≤ 330MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 61.20 ≤ 80 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | 274.78MiB ≤ 310MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_no_fs_load | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 23.30 ≤ 40 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_security_no_fs_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | 277.84MiB ≤ 320MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Replicate Execution Details
We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.
Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.
| Experiment | Variant | Replicates | Failure | Logs | Debug Dashboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| experiment_with_failures | baseline | 0 (x8) 1 (x6) | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.
❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)
Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.
| Experiment | Variant | Replicates | Failure | Debug Dashboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| quality_gate_idle_all_features | comparison | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_logs | baseline | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_metrics_logs | comparison | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_security_no_fs_load | baseline | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
hush-hush
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we add a comment explaining why we don't test vault for AIX ?
|
@hush-hush yeah definitely |
18e5b1a to
7a413c3
Compare
|
/merge |
|
View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
PR already in the queue with status waiting |
What does this PR do?
Adds
//go:build !aixtocmd/secret-generic-connector/backend/hashicorp/vault_test.go.Motivation
Caught by cross-linting with
GOOS=aix GOARCH=ppc64(see #53214). The test file importsgithub.com/hashicorp/vault/http, which transitively depends ongithub.com/hashicorp/go-secure-stdlib/mlock. That package is missing an implementation for AIX (clearly forgotten in build tags list), so it doesn't compile.Describe how you validated your changes
GOOS=aix GOARCH=ppc64 dda inv linter.go --targets=./cmd/secret-generic-connector/...Additional notes
Opened hashicorp/go-secure-stdlib#187 to fix the compilation issue upstream