Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scoped all-length proof with exact finite corroboration. For dyadic diagonal balancing of a weighted cyclic recurrence to coefficient cap beta, put d_i=ceil(log_2(|a_i|/beta)).
An explicit suffix-sum constructor attains the minimum. The least diagonal condition number is exactly 2^H. With minimum scale exponent zero, direct rescaling of arbitrary binary-grid inputs needs H additional common-grid fractional bits, and reverse scaling has sharp error gain 2^H.
For a=(2^k,2^(-k-2)) at cap 1/2, H=k+1. For a=(3/5,2/5), real scales attain cap 1/2 but no dyadic scales do, despite a strict product margin. These are scoped proofs, not search failures or a complete multiplication theorem. No new kappa or selected-frontier change.
This contribution was produced by Nick Petalas. Credit Sricharan Vagvala / theon199's PR1481, head 753c1b6, for Open next question 2 and its weighted expansive-cycle setting; Chafik Boukhalfa / PR628 and PR905, Charles Bethin / PR764, and the retained cyclic-kernel/precision lineage. Difference constraints and longest-path potentials are classical; general optimization or literature priority is unclaimed. The predecessor's scientific verifier was not replayed.
Advance CLAIM. The delivered result is the scale-range and grid-cost subproblem; the full physical balancing invoice remains open.
Evidence
Before, PR1481 left the scaling and two-grid cost of balancing unresolved. After, the written theorem gives the exact dyadic minimum and an attaining construction for every length.
Local CPython 3.12.15 checks pass at head 25d72c3:
From the repository root, reproduce with this local interpreter path or substitute another CPython 3.12 executable:
The direct marker is PASS_DYADIC_CYCLE_BALANCING. The runner reports PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE, and publication preflight reports PASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES. Receipts are generated, not handwritten or committed. Canonical main was refreshed unchanged before publication at 7c49fe3, priority revision 8.
Limitations
The universal assertion rests on the written proof, supported by the finite domains. Complex phases are covered by the proof; conjugacy fixtures use signed real rationals. The implementation has explicit finite capacities.
Relative grid span and norm transfer do not establish an optimal rounded solver. Nonuniform grids, different algorithms and non-dyadic scales may change the cost. Physical scale instructions, reversible acquisition, arbitrary dirty restoration, complete numerical heights, scratch, tape/storage, coefficient preparation, the complete supplier invoice and selected-caller admission remain unproved. All five selected assumptions remain. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed. Lean, Docker and selected scientific cold replay were not run; every registered command ran locally.
Open next questions
Related open work
No open PR on this exact dyadic balancing minimum was found in the inspected live PR bodies, handoffs and targeted searches. Sparse notes, arbitrary diffs and unpublished work remain coverage limits.
The completion refresh covered this account's twelve open PRs created since the advance CLAIM, including this PR. The eleven others, PR6460 through PR6471 excluding PR6468, concern nilpotent-Schur and characteristic-five replay, a ternary COPY floor, helper-channel capacities, a stopped-recursion coefficient, tensor reconstruction, observable-mask preparation, a fixed matcher, triangular parity cuts and compatible fitting flags. None studies this dyadic balancing minimum or reports a competing value computed here. No additional mathematical computation was run to check those contributions.
CI notes
Both hosted checks passed at exact head
25d72c368430c2e5ab494de6bef6ade08fde9b8cin run 41551117193: plan in 4m7s and replay (research/dyadic-cycle-balancing) in 1m21s. The checks were read once; run metadata confirms completed success and the matching head. Hosted replay certifies the registered normal and optimized finite checks, not independent human or formal proof-kernel acceptance of the all-length proof. All local checks listed above passed. No CI failure required repair.Merge Danger
Door: two-way
Six new files in one isolated research package. No shared implementation, predecessor archive or selected record changes.
Blast Radius: research