Working note of the Cosmochrony spectral admissibility sub-programme. Citable version: Zenodo concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21049163. Web page: https://cosmochrony.org/science/spectral/program/critical-coverage/.
The auto-calibrated saturation depth
The mechanism is an exact algebraic reduction. Every implemented three-step Weil fingerprint is a non-zero scalar multiple of a single Fourier character, so the cumulative rank is a sumset cardinality,
with
-
Deterministic (every prime
$q \ge 311$ , every admissible block sequence):$n_1(q) \le 22$ and$5/q^2 \le x_1(q) \le 99{,}689/q^2$ , so$x_1(q) \asymp q^{-2}$ ; the positive-edge and logarithmic scenarios are excluded without probabilistic input. -
Probabilistic (i.i.d. uniform generic blocks):
$n_1(q) \to 22$ and$q^2 x_1(q) \to |B_{22}| = 99{,}689$ in probability. -
Exact depth–coverage identity:
$n_1(q) = (x_1(q)/\kappa_{n_1})^{1/4}\sqrt{q}$ with$\kappa_n = |B_n|/n^4$ . -
Transitional regime: the measured depths (
$n_1 = 14$ at$q = 211$ ,$19$ at$q = 601$ ) are explained by block resonances; their deficits produce the observed effective exponent$\approx -0.76$ en route to the exact asymptotic$-2$ . -
Window closure: the implemented auto-calibrated fitting window
$[n_0, n_1]$ is deterministically empty for$q > 4 \cdot 22^4 = 937{,}024$ . -
Collapse degeneracy: the coverage-collapse ansatz
$r_q(n) \approx q,\Phi(|B_n|/q^2)$ is degenerate near the threshold front ($\Phi \equiv 0$ there); the law of$x_1$ is combinatorial, not diffusive. -
Consequence: in the dual-window limit of the canonical Fourier filtration (Q5a), the
potential coefficient
$\lambda = \lim x_1/C_{\mathrm{Heis}}$ vanishes: that limit carries no oscillator potential.
-
code/h3z_spheres.py— exact integer BFS of$H_3(\mathbb{Z})$ to depth 31: sphere sizes$s_n$ , ball sizes$|B_n|$ , central extent$\Gamma(n) = \lfloor n^2/4 \rfloor$ , and the strict crossing$n_*(10^{-3}) = 22$ ,$|B_{22}| = 99{,}689$ . - Scripts in
simulation/spectral/o25of the Cosmochrony repository:n1_resumable.py,n1_parallel.py(depth$n_1$ ),cheis_ballgrowth.py($C_{\mathrm{Heis}}$ ,$D=4$ ),lambda2_scaling.py. Both depth scripts reproduce the O28 values$4, 8, 11, 13, 14$ at$q = 29, 61, 101, 151, 211$ exactly.
The compiled PDF is generated into out/ by compile.sh (pdflatex → bibtex → pdflatex ×2).
Working paper, deposited on Zenodo (concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21049163). Companion to O28: it resolves the saturation-depth asymptotics that O28 left open.