New Profile for RHEL9: BSI - #13700
Conversation
|
Hi @sluetze. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Mab879
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please review the CI failures.
Fixing the CCE definition format
|
I think I fixed the relevant CI failures. Current failures are only systems, which do not find a test for the manual rule, which is not relevant for them. |
Mab879
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR.
Please convert the multi line YAML to use |-.
Description:
This PR adds a new profile for RHEL9. The Profile covers the Building Blocks SYS.1.1 and SYS.1.3 of BSI Basic Protection. The BSI is the Federal Office for Security Information in Germany. This profile has been tested with RHEL9 servers in combination with RH Satellite.
Rationale:
This Profile mostly maps existing rules (with one exception see Review Hints) to the controls of the building blocks. Since these controls were already relevant for the RHCOS4 profile the way to a RHEL9 profile was quite short and obvious.
Review Hints:
I cherry-picked b7398e8 into this, as this profile relies on it. It was proposed in #13121 for the rhcos4 profile