feat: ingest ESMValTool reference datasets for provenance by lewisjared · Pull Request #790 · Climate-REF/climate-ref

91.48% (+0.01%) compared to 67f1580

91.48% (+0.01%) compared to 67f1580

❌ Patch coverage is 94.11765% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...f/src/climate_ref/datasets/esmvaltool_reference.py	86.44%	6 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...limate-ref/src/climate_ref/reference_provenance.py	91.42%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...imate-ref-core/src/climate_ref_core/diagnostics.py	88.88%	1 Missing ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...mate-ref-core/src/climate_ref_core/source_types.py	`93.33% <100.00%> (+0.47%)`	⬆️
...-esmvaltool/src/climate_ref_esmvaltool/__init__.py	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...ool/src/climate_ref_esmvaltool/diagnostics/base.py	`89.75% <100.00%> (+0.12%)`	⬆️
...ool/src/climate_ref_esmvaltool/diagnostics/enso.py	`92.45% <100.00%> (+0.45%)`	⬆️
...rc/climate_ref_esmvaltool/diagnostics/reference.py	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...valtool/diagnostics/regional_historical_changes.py	`85.82% <100.00%> (+0.66%)`	⬆️
...e_ref_esmvaltool/diagnostics/sea_ice_area_basic.py	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...s/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/datasets/__init__.py	`98.13% <100.00%> (+0.05%)`	⬆️
...ages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/models/dataset.py	`98.13% <100.00%> (+0.02%)`	⬆️
packages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/solver.py	`98.94% <100.00%> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
... and 3 more

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.