Regression baseline machinery: portable native baselines + reconstruction-input capture by lewisjared · Pull Request #761 · Climate-REF/climate-ref

91.21% (+0.05%) compared to 7048752

91.21% (+0.05%) compared to 7048752

❌ Patch coverage is 90.38462% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ef-core/src/climate_ref_core/regression/capture.py	89.18%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...te-ref-pmp/src/climate_ref_pmp/diagnostics/enso.py	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...mp/src/climate_ref_pmp/diagnostics/annual_cycle.py	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️
...te-ref/src/climate_ref/cli/test_cases/baselines.py	88.88%	1 Missing ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...imate-ref-core/src/climate_ref_core/diagnostics.py	`97.33% <100.00%> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
...ate-ref-core/src/climate_ref_core/esgf/registry.py	`85.55% <ø> (ø)`
...mate-ref-core/src/climate_ref_core/output_files.py	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...-core/src/climate_ref_core/regression/_quantise.py	`100.00% <ø> (ø)`
...s/climate-ref-core/src/climate_ref_core/testing.py	`89.73% <100.00%> (+0.11%)`	⬆️
...ool/src/climate_ref_esmvaltool/diagnostics/base.py	`89.44% <100.00%> (+0.26%)`	⬆️
...limate-ref-ilamb/src/climate_ref_ilamb/standard.py	`82.10% <100.00%> (ø)`
...c/climate_ref_pmp/diagnostics/variability_modes.py	`89.09% <100.00%> (+0.20%)`	⬆️
.../climate-ref-pmp/src/climate_ref_pmp/pmp_driver.py	`78.40% <ø> (ø)`
...mate-ref/src/climate_ref/cli/test_cases/_stages.py	`94.06% <100.00%> (+0.15%)`	⬆️
... and 6 more

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.