Skip to content

docs: document SQLite as a supported Ecto backend#7

Merged
Ch4s3 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/document-sqlite-support
May 23, 2026
Merged

docs: document SQLite as a supported Ecto backend#7
Ch4s3 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/document-sqlite-support

Conversation

@Ch4s3

@Ch4s3 Ch4s3 commented May 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The Ecto persistence adapter is backend-agnostic (standard column types, runtime-bound table, no DB-specific SQL) and SQLite is the backend the test suite runs against, but the README only mentioned Postgres. Note :ecto_sqlite3 in the deps comment and add a short backend-agnostic note to the Ecto section.

The Ecto persistence adapter is backend-agnostic (standard column types,
runtime-bound table, no DB-specific SQL) and SQLite is the backend the test
suite runs against, but the README only mentioned Postgres. Note :ecto_sqlite3
in the deps comment and add a short backend-agnostic note to the Ecto section.
@Ch4s3
Ch4s3 merged commit 56a826c into main May 23, 2026
1 check passed
@Ch4s3
Ch4s3 deleted the docs/document-sqlite-support branch May 23, 2026 01:42
Ch4s3 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2026
…nown parents

- memoize each flag's resolved state within a single enabled?/2 call, so a shared
  (diamond) prerequisite graph is evaluated once instead of O(2^depth) re-walks
- propagate cycles as a distinct :cycle status so they fail closed uniformly,
  including required:false edges (which a plain false previously satisfied, making
  a mutual requires:{_,false} cycle report both flags enabled)
- treat a non-atom (unresolved) parent name as not-met (fail closed)

Addresses adversarial findings #5, #7, and the prerequisite half of #4.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant