fix(ci): fix visual-diff workflow YAML and knip entry

[riderx]

Summary (AI generated)

• Fix invalid YAML list syntax in .github/workflows/visual-diff.yml (pull_request.types entries were missing - prefixes)
• Register playwright/visual-diff.config.ts as a knip entry so dynamic imports are not flagged as unused exports

Motivation (AI generated)

PR #2576 merged with a failing Check dead code job. Knip could not parse the workflow file and reported false unused exports after the visual-diff script switched to dynamic config loading.

Business Impact (AI generated)

Restores green CI on main and allows the visual-diff workflow to run correctly on future PRs labeled visual-change.

Test Plan (AI generated)

• bun run lint:deadcode passes locally
• CI run on feat/visual-diff-pr-tool at e8861b52b passed Check dead code

Generated with AI

Made with Cursor

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@riderx, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 3 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses rolling per-developer review limits. Reviews become available again as older review attempts age out of the rolling limit window.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: cc444040-9bae-4391-907e-dced9fb8b9ee

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a48e19 and 24920b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/workflows/visual-diff.yml
• knip.json

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[cursor]

Risk: low. Cursor Bugbot check passed, but no Bugbot review comment (<!-- BUGBOT_REVIEW -->) was found on this PR, so I am not auto-approving. Requesting human review for this small CI/knip fix.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver External}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 43 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 2 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing fix/visual-diff-ci (24920b1) with main (9a48e19)}

Footnotes

1. 2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[cursor]

Risk: low. Cursor Bugbot passed with no issues, but the expected Bugbot review comment is missing on this PR, so I am not auto-approving. @WcaleNieWolny is already requested for human review of this CI/knip fix.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud