Skip to content

feat : added AI interview answer confidence score - #1913

Merged
KaranUnique merged 3 commits into
Canopus-Labs:featurefrom
tmdeveloper007:feat/interview-answer-confidence-score
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

feat : added AI interview answer confidence score#1913
KaranUnique merged 3 commits into
Canopus-Labs:featurefrom
tmdeveloper007:feat/interview-answer-confidence-score

Conversation

@tmdeveloper007

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of What Has Been Done

Added a new AI-powered frontend page at frontend/src/pages/AIInterviewAnswerConfidenceScore/ that provides an overall confidence score for interview answers, analyzing factors like word choice certainty, hedging language, and assertiveness level.

Changes Made

  • Created AIInterviewAnswerConfidenceScore.jsx with:
    • 3 mock interview questions with category labels
    • Answer display with confidence-highlighted words
    • Confidence breakdown by category (assertiveness, hedging language, word strength)
    • Comparison chart across 5 recent practice sessions
    • Specific suggestions to increase answer confidence
    • Dashboard metrics (overall confidence, assertiveness score, word strength, hedging count)
    • AI summary gradient section
    • Dark mode support throughout
    • All icons from lucide-react (no emoji in code)

Impact it Made

  • Helps users identify weak or uncertain language in their answers
  • Provides concrete suggestions to sound more confident
  • Tracks confidence improvement over practice sessions
  • Complements filler word and pacing analysis tools

Closes #1899

Note: please assign this PR to the tmdeveloper007 account.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@tmdeveloper007, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 52 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 43a2525b-584b-4ced-8ad6-00c16b90da62

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 24aa424 and 8875a5d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/src/pages/AIInterviewAnswerConfidenceScore/AIInterviewAnswerConfidenceScore.jsx

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the merge ready PR is mergeable and has no conflicts label Aug 12, 2026
@KaranUnique
KaranUnique changed the base branch from main to feature August 13, 2026 05:02
@KaranUnique
KaranUnique merged commit e370680 into Canopus-Labs:feature Aug 13, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat : add AI interview answer confidence score

3 participants