Derive the unique_id from the sensor name

[remuslazar]

This leads to more "stable" unique_ids, not losing the history data after changing the friendly_name property in
the configuration.

[remuslazar]

@Bouni this is surely a kind-of "breaking change" and will reset all existing history data for all luxtronik entities..

[Bouni]

@remuslazar @BenPru I think from now on we should only work on a dev branch. No more changes to main until the merge (on is done. Once that is the case we can also apply the PR's and release a shiny new version that maybe breaking again but that hopefully for the last time (at least in a while).

@remuslazar please rebase this to the dev branch

[remuslazar]

@Bouni sorry for the long delay here.. I have somehow missed your request. Anyway, the code was already on top of the dev branch so I have just changed the base for this PR.

btw: it will be nice to have a current release of luxtronik, this package being currently pinned to 0.3.14 which does not support new entities, e.g. HUP_PWM I was trying to use recently. Could you do that, can I help somehow here?

Thanks!

[remuslazar]

Hey @Bouni,

Just wanted to check in and see if there's been any progress here. I am using my fork for quite a while now but I will like to integrate this integration via HACS.

Let me know if I can help out with anything!

Cheers,
Remus

[Bouni]

Unfortunately, no 🫤
I have far to many side projects and to little spare time, so some things don't go forward as expected ...

[remuslazar]

@Bouni can I jump in and help you out here?