Repository navigation
Docs: draft reply to gpui-mobile#30 review - #75
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The 12 Oct force-push was only a rebase onto #29; the draft says so and lays out the plan per review point. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft reply (not posted) to huacnlee's CHANGES_REQUESTED review on longbridge/gpui-mobile#30.
The 12 Oct force-push (ec5c89d) was only a rebase onto main after #29 merged. None of the four review points or the three non-blocking suggestions are addressed yet, so the draft says that plainly and lays out a plan for each one. It should be rewritten once the fixes land.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code