Repository navigation
fix(runner): read-only launcher and explicit ungraded-result failures - #6
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
call_claudechecks the command before it starts the process and refuses to launch if a restriction is missing or a widening flag is present.call_claudevalidates the structured result against the requested schema. A missing, null or wrong-shaped result raisesAgentErrorwith the path of the problem, and shows under Coverage gaps. A well-formed empty list still succeeds. Before, a missing result was indistinguishable from "no findings".Plan units: AA-1 narrowed, AA-2 (portfolio remediation 2026-09-29).
Flag check
The three flags used exist in the help text of Claude Code 2.1.285, checked on 2026-09-30:
--tools,--disallowedTools,--strict-mcp-config. No test here launches the real CLI, so a live run is still the proof that they behave as intended.Design decisions to review
Test plan
ruff check .andruff format --check .clean.Not in this PR