Repository navigation
Verify v3.2.2 against the adopted protected quality policy - #149
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Review all 30 exceptions; retain seven unchanged and submit 23 corrected exact-source records as proposals without inherited approval. Full suite: 554 passed. Typing and architecture passed; remaining lint/exception/policy findings require protected review. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Preserve source-bound evidence, expiry, protected evaluator integrity and fail-closed CI. Registry edits alone no longer require protected review; checker adoption still does. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Keep ownership assignments, protected-file enforcement and bootstrap failure unchanged. Describe technical policy differences without soliciting reviewers or administrative approval. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…-review-pr fix: make boundary diagnostics safe and simplify exception validation
Update stale developer-doc statements that claimed the old protected checker still rejected the new evaluator pending adoption, and that a reference PR against the adopted develop base remained missing. PR #144 (merged ec18a73) adopted the new evaluator into the protected develop base, so the protected checker now applies it to subsequent PRs. This PR is the reference PR exercising the adopted base and coordinator-owned required-check controls. Independent human review of the recorded exception decisions (see .quality/exception-technical-review.json) remains outstanding, tracked by issue #695. This PR demonstrates base adoption only, not completed review. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…ce-proof docs: reference PR proving adopted UI quality policy on new develop base
…idance Correct docs/python-development.md to state that recorded exception decisions are governed by their technical evidence (exact fingerprints, same-source bound tests, unexpired stage validation) rather than a separate independent human review step. The prior text incorrectly stated that independent human review (issue #695) remained outstanding, which resurrected a bureaucracy requirement explicitly removed by the repository owner. Integrity/fingerprint/expiry/check-validation language is preserved unchanged. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…-blocker docs: remove stale independent-review blocker from policy adoption guidance
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Outcome
Genuine post-adoption reference PR required by platform ADR-0020. Base main now contains the explicitly authorized evaluator and exact technical exception records from the already integrated #144.
Scope