Repository navigation
Release v3.2.2 - #148
Release v3.2.2#148
Conversation
Review all 30 exceptions; retain seven unchanged and submit 23 corrected exact-source records as proposals without inherited approval. Full suite: 554 passed. Typing and architecture passed; remaining lint/exception/policy findings require protected review. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Preserve source-bound evidence, expiry, protected evaluator integrity and fail-closed CI. Registry edits alone no longer require protected review; checker adoption still does. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Keep ownership assignments, protected-file enforcement and bootstrap failure unchanged. Describe technical policy differences without soliciting reviewers or administrative approval. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…-review-pr fix: make boundary diagnostics safe and simplify exception validation
Update stale developer-doc statements that claimed the old protected checker still rejected the new evaluator pending adoption, and that a reference PR against the adopted develop base remained missing. PR #144 (merged ec18a73) adopted the new evaluator into the protected develop base, so the protected checker now applies it to subsequent PRs. This PR is the reference PR exercising the adopted base and coordinator-owned required-check controls. Independent human review of the recorded exception decisions (see .quality/exception-technical-review.json) remains outstanding, tracked by issue #695. This PR demonstrates base adoption only, not completed review. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…ce-proof docs: reference PR proving adopted UI quality policy on new develop base
…idance Correct docs/python-development.md to state that recorded exception decisions are governed by their technical evidence (exact fingerprints, same-source bound tests, unexpired stage validation) rather than a separate independent human review step. The prior text incorrectly stated that independent human review (issue #695) remained outstanding, which resurrected a bureaucracy requirement explicitly removed by the repository owner. Integrity/fingerprint/expiry/check-validation language is preserved unchanged. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…-blocker docs: remove stale independent-review blocker from policy adoption guidance
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
This release incorporates the technical exception-policy adoption already explicitly authorized by the maintainer, implemented in #144 and merged into develop on 2026-10-10 (platform ADR-0020). Main still runs the older protected evaluator: its three policy findings reject the previously approved evaluator/CODEOWNERS/registry migration; the associated BLE001 and exception-review findings consume stale main records rather than the technically validated candidate records. Runtime unit and installed Linux-container acceptance, typing and architecture are successful; the same runtime source passed every protected-develop quality gate in #147. This is a deliberate adoption operation, not a claim of a remotely passing legacy gate. No checker, gate or exception allowance is being changed by this release preparation. A genuine follow-up release-only PR against the newly adopted main evaluator will be required to pass every check before publishing v3.2.2. |
Changed
Validation