Skip to content

docs(testnet): document Paradox channel migration - #411

Merged
3esmit merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
3esmit/fix-274-paradox-docs
Sep 16, 2026
Merged

3esmit merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
3esmit/fix-274-paradox-docs

Conversation

@3esmit

@3esmit 3esmit commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • document the current Paradox Computer channel and sequencer endpoint
  • explain the historical 8888… versus current 7777… separation
  • provide safe source-recreation and read-only verification steps
  • keep source attestation and L1 ancestry safeguards explicit

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • cargo run --quiet -- cli rpc --help
  • RISC0_SKIP_BUILD=1 cargo run --quiet -- cli rpc https://seq-testnet.paradox.computer/ getChannelId
    • returned 7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777

Refs #274.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 16, 2026 11:18

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-16T16:35:55.352826Z 26890c7 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dbe9eba759

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

For a read-only check from a prepared source checkout:

```bash
cargo run -- cli rpc https://seq-testnet.paradox.computer/ getChannelId

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Include the required RISC0 build guard in the check

In a normally prepared source checkout without the RISC0 guest-build toolchain, this copy-and-paste command enables the default development-testnet-v02-helper feature and can fail during compilation before making the RPC request. The repository's source-build instructions consistently use RISC0_SKIP_BUILD=1, and this commit's own validation ran the RPC command with that prefix. Include the prefix here, or use the documented headless CLI feature flags, so operators can perform the advertised read-only check.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@3esmit
3esmit force-pushed the 3esmit/fix-274-paradox-docs branch 5 times, most recently from 3eccae7 to 1d721ae Compare September 16, 2026 16:19
@3esmit
3esmit force-pushed the 3esmit/fix-274-paradox-docs branch from 1d721ae to 26890c7 Compare September 16, 2026 16:33
@3esmit
3esmit merged commit 1337656 into main Sep 16, 2026
9 checks passed
@3esmit
3esmit deleted the 3esmit/fix-274-paradox-docs branch September 16, 2026 16:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants